OasissisaO

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dreamed just the other day that I broke mine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We would also accept "Reject all"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. There's a lot of projection going on here. While I understand that art allows us to see and project ourselves onto it, I don't believe a movie about a plastic fashion doll is quite the same.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Because the way Threads works is almost seamlessly allowing existing Instagram users to create a Threads account. There is no corollary for Masto or Lemmy or any Fed entities to do something similar.

It's corporate synergy, baby.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really depends. If you're in a smaller instance and you look at the global view, you're going to see more of Mr. 16.5% than one of the smaller ones.

Though I suspect usage patterns and the way users interact with instances beyond theirs will play a role. But, in an immediate sense, I could see larger instances having a bigger voice (so to speak).

And now I'll waffle and say it's all a crapshoot because people are unpredictable and social media platforms even more so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

3067 is a lot of ways to slice half a pie. I'd consider even 16.5% (or whatever the top dog of that 3 with 50% has) to be domination.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly.

So you find an instance you love, with a federation philosophy you agree with, and build up a brand (for lack of a better word) there.

What happens when that philosophy either changes or allows the instance to become something different than what originally appealed to you? Do you suck it up and stay or try to create a new presence elsewhere with minimal damage?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah. And I find myself vacillating between agreeing with and disagreeing with the idea of defederation or partial defederation.

I think it requires enlightened admins to walk the line, which is a challenge. Not knocking the folks that run their respective instances, but they are humans who have their own motivations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nothing would piss me off more than getting banned from a sub I never had any intention of visitng much less engaging in because I commented on a post from one of their disliked subs.

The curse of spending too much time in r/All.

[–] [email protected] 128 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You probably got banned because you referred to it as being from "The Office", when it's originally from "SNL"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No. You are, and it's well-taken! I kept getting a getting network error message and assumed it was not going through. I (thought I) verified that it didn't go through. And attempted to submit again. Wondering if they got queued and then submitted when the issue resolved.

view more: next ›