I don't have it on a phone a with play services.
I'm also in the EU in case that matters
I don't have it on a phone a with play services.
I'm also in the EU in case that matters
That's only true if there was actual significant violence by the protestors at least in the last half century.
If a dog barks all the time but never bites you'll stop fearing it.
People like you, are why I moved away.
Sure you could just be another Russian troll.
But I knew way too many fucking idiots like you in real life too years ago as to know there's a good chance that you're not a troll.
The only consolidation I have is that dumbasses like you will suffer along with the rest, even if not as much as you deserve compared to those who knew better.
Imagine saying that with a straight face with one side has just declared they want to very actively partake in the genocide and just do the job themselves.
This is like saying giving a murderer a knife is the same as going in with a machine gun yourself.
Elizabeth Eckford had the protection of the federal government (this is it you ignore that she got PTSD so bag from the experience she attempted suicide btw).
Today's federal government on the other hand is on the side of the people yelling:
You ever hear about the Black Panthers? You know why they were so successful California and the FBI had to intervene to try to disband them? Here's a hint:
And you know why they were armed? Here's another hint to how non-armed black protestors were usually dealt with in history (sfw example):
An unarmed protest is a defenseless one with no deterrent for the aggressors. And if you're protesting against literal Nazis, it's not going to be peaceful. Even during Trump's first term people were kidnapped, and he's way more unhinged this time.
I think they went closed source
Trump's people would probably be more likely to shoot you if unarmed, than if the crown was armed.
It's been shown multiple times (and through history) the the opposing force is less likely to shoot the protestors if the protesters can shoot back, because now there's also an actual danger to them.
If people don't go armed, I'm worried what could happen.
The thing is, they care about privacy and such, but don't know about tech really 😅 otherwise I would have gotten the easy route.
I know multiple people like this though.
In your case you should probably give plasma Bigscreen a try depending your hardware.
If you don't mind a keyboard, I will say Ubuntu ran surprisingly well, but consider a lightweight browser unless you have 8gb + of RAM
Absol? (j)
Well, on a raspberry pi 4 4gb, no. It's very sluggish.
Maybe on a 5 with 8gb?
The next device I was going to test though is an Odroid C4 (4gb).
I'm currently going to meet with Bliss Rom creators to discuss getting Netflix etc working on Android as well in a sandboxed manner that still gives 1080p (maybe standard Android though with Flauncher instead of Android TV)
It's tricky to have a privacy friendly device that can also run mainstream, well, streaming clients.
I'm making this to make an easy to use box that works with a plain IR sensor remote for my parents (along with a customized Rustdesk client app in case they need help).
If that's not a problem though (like you want to use Radarr/Lidarr) then you can just a Lineage OS version of Android TV, although it seems Konstakang's version has issues with audio over HDMI on Android 12 and above.
Seems other commentators outside USA are saying similar things.
If true, I wouldn't trust this app at all, because it just be breaking GDPR somehow