LoreSoong

An open source adverts market acutually sounds like an insane, yet viable solution ive never considered. Not only would it be benefitial to users. But the adverts themselves would save money based on the fact that large corps fake advert data to bolster the price on their platform. curious did you come up with that or was this an idea thats been floating aroud?

I agree with every single point youve made. Except

There's not really any serious competition, people would still watch it.

If youtube stared pulling a reddit and implementing changes that users felt offended enough by many people would probably do what we are doing now. And find a decentralized platform like peertube or lemmy. Obviously reddit and youtube are not going anywhere but its still competiton even if its not "serious". a few hundred thousand users is alot in terms of profit.

Just because they've been dumb with privacy laws, doesn't mean they have to do that to find adblockers.

Google has all of the cards. like you said forced logins, drm, in stream adverts are all 1000% in our near future. I just think that before we actually get there we shouldnt roll over and take the abuse.

Genuinely appreciate the discourse on this, but im slightly frustrated that i simply implied that it "seems illegal" and I have multiple people explaining that its not illegal, they dont need to x and y to detect adblock, and that google has all the power. IM AWARE i just wish we could hold them accountable for the MANY infractions on privacy that theyve been guiltly of in the past, and continue to be, and see little to no repercussions.

I think youre locked into percieving this as a user who has a google account who has agreed to google's terms and services. I can go on youtube with no account and watch content with an adblocker on a completely fresh system and IP adress and have the same experience. From what you are saying by simply visiting the website you are agreeing to be tracked and marked as a adblock user. (This obviously happens all the time but lets not let google get away with it) Regardless of the detection method.

I think this would be fine if google forced you to click agree to terms to veiw content. But they dont, so in essence they are collecting data about you and your terminal without your consent which should be illegal. Obviously im bias against google, but i genuinely think it sets a bad precedent. Especially with how shitty and ad flooded the internet has become.

Hanff first reached out to the European Commission about the use of ad blocker detection tools in 2016. In response to his concerns, the commission confirmed that scripts used to detect ad blockers also fall under Article 5.3 of the ePrivacy Directive, a rule that requires websites to ask for user consent before storing or accessing information on a user’s device, such as cookies. “Article 5.3 does not limit itself to any particular type of information or technology, such as cookies,” the commission wrote at the time. “Article 5(3) would also apply to the storage by websites of scripts in users’ terminal equipment to detect if users have installed or are using ad blockers.”

https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/7/23950513/youtube-ad-blocker-crackdown-privacy-advocates-eu

Tldr:Just googled it and this came up. wasnt sure if it was illegal (its not). in the EU theres a guy named Alexander Hanff who very much thinks it should be and I agree.

They are monitoring traffic and scripts and storing information about the user without consent. In other words spyware. And from what you said "many adblockers arent even add ons" isnt that worse? The Pihole for example being detected and a corp like google storing that your ip has one. Makes me very uncomfortable.

please no replies with "youtube is providing a serivice that needs to be paid for, ads are a nessecarry blah blah blah." It doesnt justify spyware.

So you assume the spreader would be able to deform the frame and door seam regardleas of the strength of the door pannels? Not exactly the answer i was looking for bc id still like to see it in action. The tesla truck was presented as indestructable which seemed foolish from the start. (lacking crumple zones, and the material choice) it was being critized from the start, idk how it passed saftey standards.

Probably foolish to believe but i havent switched to jellyfin because im worried its not as secure as plex. plex also has a convienent app on most tvs phones and streaming boxes. Am i giving up on any of these when switching?

I am curious if anyone with better knowlage of material science would know if the stainless steel doors wouldve opened with the "jaws of life" Ive seen images of high speed crashed cybertrucks and it seems that the outer shell barely deforms from the impact. Even if a rescue team was on the scene would they have survived?

Websites dont have the ability to see what addons you are using. Youtube must be tracking and storing local traffic data to accomplish this.

Seems illegal