LainTrain

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, it is a tool of the commons to subvert the intellectual property regime of the petit bourgeoisie artists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Nah it's all algorithms now I'm sorry :(

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Solidarity with you bourgeoisie fucks is like the solidarity of the turtle with the scorpion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

So true bestie

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Are you implying that Facebook et al do not optimise for engagement? What do they optimise for then?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah what's engagement? Interactions. The winning move is not to play the game. I've yet to hear reasons why this is more difficult than e.g. stopping littering on the street or eating junk food.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

Ah yes what the world needs right now - even more scam peddlers. I for one thank our corporate overlords for deciding for us. A waste of natural resources in scale second only to the data-harvesting-marketing ouroboros

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (13 children)

Facebook doesn't cause physical dependency on a chenical

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I hope it's not, and this is just twitter being twitter but you never know I suppose. Not worth making assumptions over one tweet, least of all about anything in the real world, nothing further from reality than the average tweeter.

view more: ‹ prev next ›