HParker

joined 1 year ago
[–] HParker 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought i had read that TSMC was keeping 2nm and more advanced technology domestic. I guess that only applies up to 2030? Maybe because they will have a new more advanced method by then.

It is interesting that they work up to 2nm starting from 4nm and 5nm. Are those processes significantly easier or cheaper to start?

[–] HParker 10 points 2 months ago (8 children)

For those uninitiated like myself, what is special about Discworld?

[–] HParker 1 points 7 months ago

Great article! I especially like the part talking about limitations and when autotuner might make P99.99 worse. Great to keep in mind when tuning GC.

[–] HParker 1 points 7 months ago

Very cool that Ruby can get that much faster with relatively small changes. Even just the implicit return + array allocation tip is a useful one on its own.

[–] HParker 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Like 2 down in my feed was this one from the verge that is less risky a click. https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24079529/nvidia-app-geforce-experience-control-panel-windows

[–] HParker 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

MariaDB is a mysql based product like the Percona stuff right? I assume most users would switch to MySQL proper.

Postgres is often a better choice, but not an easy one for shops already in the mysql world.

[–] HParker 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ah maybe my perspective is wrong. I didn’t know this is how the EU does it. Does this rule apply to plastic or fabric as well? Or maybe only plastic used for food? regulating recycled plastic that is used for food makes a ton of sense to me.

[–] HParker 26 points 9 months ago (5 children)

We found 191 pesticides, 107 pharmaceuticals and 81 industrial compounds among many others in the recycled plastic pellets.

This sentence seems so meaningless. Things being pesticides or pharmaceuticals doesn’t make them harmful and even if they are harmful, are they in concentrations that matter for humans?

The science article they link: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adk9846

Uses much better more meaningful language to describe the same problem! It is also much shorter and easier to read.

[–] HParker 8 points 10 months ago

This article quotes the “1/3 of 1%” number for large scale property investors. Seems like the vast majority of property buys are still people that intend to live there, though the “49% of 26%” (btw why are all the statistics in these weird formats???) are 1-9 property owners”mom and pop” investors. That number is actually way bigger than i thought. I could see this being a problem is some locations more than others though. That might make the problem feel bigger in some areas.

[–] HParker 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree reform sounds great! I agree many systems can be improved. Lots of government officials could do with some more accountability.

I personally still love wikipedia for this kind of high level analysis, but you are welcome to use whatever sources you like!

[–] HParker 10 points 11 months ago

Thank you! I was unaware.

[–] HParker 20 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Do you have a link? Looks like Bastian Obermayer is still alive.

view more: next ›