Crul
From (Spanish) Las salpas, las extrañas criaturas que llenan las playas de Málaga
estos invertebrados no tienen nada que ver con las medusas, por lo que no son urticantes, (...)
"Son el paso intermedio entre los invertebrados y los vertebrados, puesto que tienen una primitiva columna, y forman parte del plancton, la sopa marina que es la base de la cadena alimenticia en el mar", ha manifestado.
These invertebrates have nothing to do with jellyfish, so they are not stinging, (…)
“They are the intermediate step between invertebrates and vertebrates, since they have a primitive column, and they are part of plankton, the marine soup that is the base of the food chain in the sea,” he said.
Also on their website: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - LLM
Hover text: Best you can do with cosmos-3.5 is get a universe that's classical at low speeds.
RSS Feed: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/rss
Also on their website: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - LLM
Hover text: Best you can do with cosmos-3.5 is get a universe that's classical at low speeds.
RSS Feed: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/rss
By the way, both links in your post lead to two different Spanish editions, mine is the one from the second link.
Thanks... I must have had a brain fart. I don't know why I though it was a German edition, probably the font (facepalm).
Fixed!
Awesome! Thank you very much for the heads up.
It seems to be working perfectly, even with videos. This is great!
Also on Webtoons:
https://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/system32comics/list?title_no=235074
Which has RSS feed:
https://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/system32comics/rss?title_no=235074
I think is this one:
daniel everett is the guy who worked on pirahã. he has all sorts of fantastical claims about the language but chief among it is the idea that the language doesn't include recursion because the speakers avoid relative clauses (not what recursion means in this context but ok). the papers are basically unfalsifiable because the pirahã people distrust outsiders, rightly so, and he steers very close to outright calling the people primitive savages, which is very uncomfortable. if you call him out on his shit he just calls you a chomsky shill. super toxic guy.
I find it funny that it's from the same user that wrote this comment in another meme I posted about it:
everett's papers are incoherent and contradictory
yes we should be skeptical of any theory. but finding proof that one part of a theory might be wrong does not make the entire theory wrong (also evidence keeps emerging that everett had an incomplete understanding of pirahã as for example didn't someone prove that recursion is actually possible in pirahã, just marked by prosody rather than syntax?). and then framing it as "fuck chomsky" rather than "fuck universal grammar" is disingenuous at the very least.
i dunno i could say more but i won't. i will say though: the way that everett frames this discussion as being either with him or with chomsky is frankly delusional
Found with new Reddit's comment search:
https://new.reddit.com/search/?q=Daniel%2BEverett%2Bcopypasta&type=comment
I thought you were Melvyn Yeo... then I looked at the picture :)
Source: Socks and Puppets, the comic » 779 – Summoning Ray
If I'm not mistaken: @[email protected]
RSS Feed: https://comicpress.socksandpuppets.com/feed/