BlueBockser

joined 1 year ago
[–] BlueBockser 6 points 3 months ago

Mag der Definition mach kein Rauchen sein, aber sonderlich förderlich für die Lunge ist es trotzdem nicht...

[–] BlueBockser 3 points 3 months ago

Dann zeigt das Tacho aber schon mindestens 55 🤬

[–] BlueBockser 8 points 3 months ago

Rechts ist frei

~ Der Beifahrer

[–] BlueBockser 1 points 3 months ago

Anikan er oder Anikann er nicht?

[–] BlueBockser 21 points 3 months ago

Nothing, this is not about that.

This change gives you the guarantee that .internal domains will never be registered officially, so you can use them without the risk of your stuff breaking should ICANN ever decide to make whatever TLD you're using an official TLD.

That scenario has happened in the past, for example for users of FR!TZBox routers which use fritz.box. .box became available for purchase and someone bought fritz.box, which broke browser UIs. This could've even been used maliciously, but thankfully it wasn't.

[–] BlueBockser 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Being in alpha and having breaking changes is fine, the question is how many. My impression is that Immich seems to introduce breaking changes far more frequently than what people might be used to from other projects.

And that does go back to professionalism: The better you plan ahead, the fewer breaking changes you have to impose on your users.

[–] BlueBockser 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Minio now describes itself as "S3 & Kubernetes Native Object Storage for AI" - lol

Guess it's time to look for alternatives if you're not doing ML stuff

[–] BlueBockser 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't (30px)² be 30*30*px*px and thus 900px²?

[–] BlueBockser 9 points 5 months ago

cataas - not to be confused with catass

[–] BlueBockser -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

currently being tested

They've been "testing" it for more than a decade at this point and even if Russia is able to actually bring the T-14 into service, they won't be able to produce any significant number of them for the same reason their tank corps isn't using many T-90M right now.

pure garbage

Go look up Operation Desert Storm and rethink what you wrote there.

If there's anything here that's garbage, it's your notions about tank design.

[–] BlueBockser 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

more manoeuvrable

Ah yes, there's nothing quite like a 4 km/h reverse speed. That's a really tangible factor making the T-72 a better tank.

[–] BlueBockser 2 points 5 months ago

Da braucht man schon viel kriminelle Energie für. Otto Normalverbraucher findet vmtl. nicht mal die F5 Taste...

view more: ‹ prev next ›