Bananigans

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I got Mankey, 6 Pikachu in a row, a Butterfree, then Lapras. I had to double check it wasn't just Pikachu rewards at one point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly looks like Rock Band Bucks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Chupa mi heuvos." They're not saying to suck their literal eggs.

So...Chupa Chups are literally suck sucks?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

All good possible points, but only one person in this thread can answer what the number basis is, so who knows.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Really looking forward to the Spacetime episode on this one if it doesn't exist yet.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

If you read the comments, it's actually not. Inflation alone doesn't account for pinning wages near $30, so that's not really a good explanation given that it's nonfactual. Even if he's considering the living wage instead of historical minimums, $30 is still about 30% higher than what an average living wage would be. Is there some other consideration he has that I'm missing? I wouldn't know without asking due to an unfortunate lack of psychic powers.

Anyways, sorry I asked for the policy reasoning behind a policy position. It clearly offended many, I realize my mistake, and won't bring that kind of nonsense around here again.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I understand your sentiment, but if that's your policy basis, you'd be asking for $10 /he instead of $15.

Not necessarily a bad idea, I just wanted to know how that number was generated, because without that data, it's not necessarily a good idea either.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

What's the basis for $30/hr? First time seeing that number in the wild.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Wノ⁠(⁠ ⁠º⁠ ⁠_⁠ ⁠º⁠ノ⁠)

(⁠ヘ ⁠º⁠ ⁠_⁠ ⁠º)ヘW 🎎

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

As per records, Tokugawa Ienari - who was a shogun and died in 1841 - had fathered nearly 53 children

So...52?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

We can agree it's not a bad one though.

view more: next ›