this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
985 points (99.3% liked)

The Onion

4502 readers
744 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 162 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I’m sure we are all confused as to why morale has been so low these last few weeks,” Peter said, although everyone else seems to agree that the layoffs are to blame. “It’s about time we got to the bottom of this mystery. I’ve conducted a thorough search and determined that remote work is to blame.

Are you spying at the company I work for?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 9 months ago

We've taken away many things you liked and given you absolutely nothing. Why aren't you happy?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Wait, are we coworkers?

[–] [email protected] 98 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I'm still slightly peeved about an old CEO that was all about "making data driven decisions" but when people presented data he didn't like he'd ignore it.

"Hey a couple studies are showing that 4 day work weeks are a net positive, do you-"

"We're not doing that "

"But look at this data."

" Next question."

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago

It's always like that. "Facts before ego", except when it's your facts and my ego.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This is why we need to replace humans workers with AI starting at the top instead of the bottom.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Bad idea. In order to get a computer to do anything useful, you must first be honest about what outcome you want. This means saying the quiet part out loud, resulting an an AI prompt something like:

Develop a business plan optimizing for shareholder value, maximizing bonus payout for top leadership, leveraging all company assets, while avoiding lawsuits that will end the company. Legal problems are okay provided they do not interfere with increasing company value. Assume full workforce productivity and minimal depreciation on assets.

What follows is a cutthroat business plan that will make a killing on Wall St. in the short run, and make everyone in said business absolutely miserable. All remaining ethics that are left at the C-level get thrown right in the trash. Also: this kills the environment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True, but I'm hoping they just feed in their company mission and the AI goes insane trying to make sense of it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Or, we could just implement the algorithms that are already available, and not tell it to maximize shareholder value, but instead company productivity, and you'll get the most efficient companies possible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

There was an article back in 2011 that predicted that middle and upper management were already completely replaceable using management algorithms. They want the tech to replace the rest of us before they implement that level of automation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I have no mouth and I must scream. We're already there with the stock market, we just have useless ceo's.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

At a "town hall", many months ago ...

VP: We would like to hear feedback from all of you.

Me: And what would be the best way we can provide you with that feedback?

VP: ...

VP: (thinking - obviously didn't have an answer for this)

VP: ...

VP: just email me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

what he really meant was he felt really good when data backed his priors

[–] [email protected] 92 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is this "company culture" in the room right now?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And his buddy, "collaboration".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is he bringing his dog, Synergy?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

I hear Synergy is Best of Breed

[–] [email protected] 66 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“The layoffs will continue until morale improves”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You are going to have fun, whether you like it or not.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Ok, I ate the onion on this one.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's because at least one CEO has said this exact statement.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

I mean, I assume the real article left out the "3rd round of layoffs" part.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because I swear I’ve read similar statements. Ate the fuck out of this onion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah got me too

[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (3 children)

My company had a feedback meeting (wasn't planned, but the staff are just that fed up), and it was spicy. We've not received pay reviews, management never let us give them feedback, people feel demotivated and unheard.

The CEO's solution? A new 'cameras always on' policy. SMH

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

Whipping will continue until morale improves

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"We need more 'water cooler conversations'."

The only "work" getting talked about around the water cooler is how much we hate working here and how we're going to quit and get a job someplace that sucks less.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Or how latoffs are affecting morale and workload.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Uh, this is basically real news though. Even just this week my company asked why people aren't taking risks and submitting "side projects" and what they don't want to hear is "because four rounds of layoffs in a year has absolutely crushed anyone's willingness to do so?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

sure I am gonna devote whatever little time left to myself to do side projects for you so that you increase your chances of stumbling upon a new innovation that will make you even more rich. solid idea.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And if that project fails, you're fired.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

Almost ate the whole onion on this one.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago

The tears are made by cutting onions.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I feel like the CEO should be required to resign if they let a company get to the point where multiple rounds of layoffs are required. They need to own the failure of their decisions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sadly, at the board level, layoffs aren't seen as a failure. They are preferred.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Then the news should report it as if the company is doing bad. That will make the shareholders freak out.

"Company X financially looking bad, tries to compensate by laying off essential workers."

"Another round of layoffs at Company X, are they on a brink of bankruptcy?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Force you to move across the country just so they can fire you after over hiring

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'd like to think if I moved across the country to keep a job like that, that'd I'd demand something like a 2+ year contract with an exorbitantly high severance package pre-negotiated.

If it's that or get fired, may as well try, not worth uprooting for otherwise

[–] sukhmel 6 points 9 months ago

Probably not the thing everyone thought about before the layoffs became a thing. Also probably not what a company is going to agree to, but that may even be a good thing because good riddance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Nah so they can avoid calling it a layoff

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

We’re a family and being forced together in an office is part of our DNA, our corporate culture of control. Because we work better together when we force you back from of a situation we previously told you was going to be the “new normal”, but since we collectively decided we stopped caring anymore we’re going to pretend we never said that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Don't insult buttseks by comparing it to this turd of a CEO.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

No it isn't, commentary about it to mask the layoffs meant to temporarily juice stock prices and discipline labor at the expense of human beings is ruining "company culture" - or at least it would if that was actually a thing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Maybe repeated rounds of layoffs destroying company morale is what's hurting your company culture. Bunch of egomaniacs in charge...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

The company culture is to fire people regularly.

It is not so fun when they are always remote.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Generally its the president not getting enough respect, most literally dont deserve any.

load more comments
view more: next ›