this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
36 points (95.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39208 readers
452 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello, i am looking for a self hosted application for sharing files like with wetransfer. I have tried the discontinued Firefox Send which has nice features like link expiry and works great in general but lacks authentication (only offers simple password protection). I also want the option to share with registered users. Is there anything similar out there? Thanks

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can selfhost Bitwarden/Vaultwarden (which I recommend, since it's rewritten in Rust and you get all the premium features for free) and use Bitwarden Send. This is probably more secure than most other options.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Though for the actual password selfhosting part of it, that is too much for my blood. Much higher chance that I would seriously fuck something up and lose access to hundreds of services than the remote bitwarden server gets compromised or becomes too shitty to use.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can continue using the cloud hosted version of Bitwarden and only use your own instance for file sharing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or pay the astoundingly low $10/yr for Premium and use Send on the cloud servers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I've been a premium customer for years because I find the service very useful, but this community is all about selfhosting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

True enough, but I like to slide in an ad in for Bitwarden every once in a while. I don't think my $10 alone is going to keep them afloat :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I'm pretty sure Bitwarden is profitable, about a year ago they even purchased another company: https://bitwarden.com/blog/bitwarden-extends-passwordless-leadership-with-acquisition/

Also, I don't think they make that much money from individuals. They focus more on businesses, because they pay more and these customers stay around for a long time, they can't easily switch to a different solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I pay my $10 license and a personal organisation license for bitwarden because I like their platform but after yet another irrecoverable loss of data (partly my fault for not sufficiently backing it up) I've moved over to vaultwarden for my family's password management.

I don't think I'll stop supporting bitwarden even if I'm not using their platform directly though as I do like the service I've had from them for something like 4 or 5 years now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How'd you manage to lose data? I've never even noticed the sync service be down, let alone lose anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

One time I ran out of disk space due to it having created since 200gb log files (not sure why that happened) then another time I think I broke something whilst moving from I've got to another. I can't remember what else happened to break my instances but it was always big enough there I couldn't restore it to working it after hours if work, so if just export the vaults from everyone's machine, nuke it, start again and try to learn how I broke it so I didn't do it again.

I believe I was the problem for most of them except the massive log files one, but still, it was probably my fault as the things usually are. (Guess whose wife has them well trained at accepting the blame 😋)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Oh, sorry. I thought you were saying the Bitwarden cloud server was losing your passwords or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

If you have regular backups, not an issue. I use bitwarden self hosted through home assistant, which makes daily backups trivial.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was recently introduced to Croc which is great for point-to-point immediate shares. If you want something async, I wrote Korra some years ago. It might do the job for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Croc has worked nicely for me when I had to transfer very large files. I'll check out Korra next time if "async" means it will start transferring once the first file is hashed. That always annoyed me about Croc and I'd manually break my transfers into chunks because I didn't want to wait 10min before even one file was transferred.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not really. It's async in the sense that you can send a file now, and the server will hold it in an encrypted state until your recipient comes to collect it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so it's not [necessarily] a direct transfer between peers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Nope. It's definitely not. The idea is just to make it safe(r) to share files within an organisation. The assumption is that for direct P2P sharing you'll want something simpler like Croc.

[–] anzo 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Since no one mentioned, there's a Firefox send fork alive, send.vis.ee or src GitHub.com/timvisee/send

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Send is super cool! Fixed you link: https://timvisee.com/projects/send/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I use Pingvin only thing it does not have is sharing with registered users but it seems that feature has been requested so might be added at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is a bit overkill for my purposes...i just need the filesharing part...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No personal experience with it but this project seem to be interesting for your use case and have a docker so it's easy to test:
https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Filebrowser is awesome, but I dont think you can share files with non users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It supports sharing via public link. But I don't think it has sharing with registered users via username.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Dang I didnt know that, my bad...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I've used Nextcloud for this in the past too, but it looks like there's a ton of other options as well judging by this thread.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, sftpgo.com seems to have a nice web frontend for users while also benefitting from all that sftp offers. Free open-source with paid support. https://github.com/drakkan/sftpgo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think http://www.youtransfer.io is a wettasfer clone. Works perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Looks like it does not have user registration, does it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It does not, it’s meant to be single use as far as I know. But the link expiry can be customised

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does it offer user registration?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Um, unfortunetly no, sorry.

[–] dave 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

This comes closest to what i am looking for..thanks..

[–] onlinepersona 1 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Try out fileshelter. It's super lightweight and works pretty reliably.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Vault warden Send Pair drop is also neat (an airdrop replacement)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Seafile. I've used it for years, but I'm moving over to nextcloud as I could use other features it provides. They have paid options too, but unless you need LDAP or something more sophisticated for user management the community edition works just fine.