You already can. Not voting will add 0 points to the counter. Exactly as much as adding 1 up and 1 downvote would.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
This is true for communities that count upvotes and downvotes as +1 and -1 on a single score, but there are plenty of instances where upvotes and downvotes are totaled as two different scores. Not voting gives no response to the original creator, but double-voting like what OP is suggesting would provide +2 total interactions for users on the latter communities.
Checkmate, science bitchz
I might love a part and strongly dislike the other part of a post or comment.
That sounds like a comment in reply would be a better option.
Ain't nobody got time for that.
Not voting would do the same.
Upvote then comment on how you hated it.
I hate this comment
I hate this hated comment
IMO your best route in that scenario would be to leave a comment.
So, you want a quantum voting system?
You think that you deserve two votes, when everybody has just one? :-)
Even better. Have floating point +ive and -ive votes. You can put whatever value you want as long as the sum of absolute values of + vote and - vote is <= 1. And >= 0 of course
And while we're at it, why is voting only one-dimensional? We should be able to vote a post to the left and right as well, to fully control where it is on the screen.
Could also have strength of a vote. Not just a +/- 1 but could also choose +/- 2, 3 (or more).
Not sure adding complexity to voting will make it better. Or more popular.
I made two accounts for this purpose.
This post violates rule 5. Locking.