As a steam deck owner and Linux user, its pretty cool to show my friends the Steam Desktop mode, and how Linux works.
Linux Gaming
Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.
Recommended news sources:
Related chat:
Related Communities:
Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.
Didn't Pornhub see a non-insignificant rise in Linux as well? I wonder how much the steam deck accounted for that as well π
That seems... awkward. It's hard enough to hold with one hand, but also trying to navigate at the same time is going to be tricky.
Not if the yanking process is relegated to an attachment to the back of the console. I know I have scarred you for life.
I guess you'd get intimate with your Deck.
Yay, linux use was around 1% the beginning of 2023, now it's so close to 2%, I hope we see an exponential growth by the end of this year.
I just switched my aging gaming rig to Linux over the Xmas break. One more grain of sand to add to the pile!
Welcome to the linux community.
Only 5-6 years until Linux is at 100% at this rateβ¦
In 8 years Linux will be around 500%
One of my paradoxes, im anticapitalist and I'm greeting valve for their work on steamdeck (not an owner) and proton.
That's participate to democratize the use of Linux as a daily OS a lot.
You can be anticapitalist and still agree with certain companies. Especially when those companies are private, and are not beholden to corrupt shareholders. Private companies are significantly more capable of having and sticking to their morals.
They also go down the hole faster once someone with looser ethics takes control.
It's the paradox of the benevolent dictator, sure they can provide fantastic and quick service to their subjects... but as soon as the ruler is no longer benevolent, it's just a dictatorship.
Public shareholders are no more corrupt nor less moral than private shareholders, but all of their incentives and information end up being based on more short-term results. Valve is every bit as driven by money as any other company, but they're thinking long-term, and they believe that there's more money to be made long-term by treating customers better than their competitors do. That means they release open hardware that isn't locked down, unlike what their competitors do. They want to mitigate business risk by decoupling PC gaming from a dependency on Microsoft, and all sorts of very capitalist entities mutually benefit from a healthy, usable Linux ecosystem that they can each make work for their own needs.
Whether or not public shareholders are more or less moral than private shareholders is not really quantifiable, and neither of us can say with certainty that it is true. I certainly agree that that public shareholders often focus on short term results, but it's not true all the time. There are public companies that think long term and private companies that think very short term.
There are, but the incentives put in place by public companies tend to favor short-term results when they're releasing quarterly earnings, something that some big investors have pushed back against for that very reason. Public investors may not be more corrupt either, but they may be less knowledgeable about the harm they're doing when they make changes to the product to get more revenue, like that infamous investor call where someone suggested charging $1 to make Mario jump higher. Microtransactions are clearly a business model that customers are willing to pay for, so it makes sense that person would raise the question, but I doubt that guy plays Mario games in his spare time, because no one who does would suggest that.
Being anti capitalist and being in favor of capitalist companies injecting ressources into projects that benefit everyone is compatible imo. Especially when that company does not ask for anything in return and makes the work open source
What we hope is for them to continue this approach that is helping both them (detaching from Windows, where they see Microsoft Store as a threat) and the users. Even if in the future there is a chance they might either back down or do less than liked actions, their positive contribution will remain.
I imagine Linux will cap at about 5% if not lower of overall use.
It's good to see competition but I just can't see it picking up much more. Steamdeck only has so many people willing to pick up essentially a console, and PC users aren't gojng to change for the most part.
There's a good chance there will be a virtuous cycle, where the Steam Deck's popularity makes it easier to game on Linux for regular PC users too, which will help out everyone gaming on Linux. Especially as Microsoft keeps dicking around with Windows and trying to turn it into a subscription OS and people just get sick of it.
Yeah, that's where that 5% is coming from. Without that virtuous cycle, I'm guessing it would stay between 2-3%. The Steam Deck is cool, but it's still fairly niche, and many Steam Deck users don't intend to ever use Linux on their home PCs (e.g. my coworkers that have them).
So does the Deck make for a good introduction to Linux?
That depends on what you're looking for.
If you want an example of how Linux is completely suitable for gaming and can be an extremely smooth experience, it's fantastic! Everything just works and essentially feels like a console, but with more features available.
If you want an example of how desktop Linux feels to use every day, it's not great. Again, it basically feels like a console until you drop into desktop mode, and then there's limitations like the read only filesystem that you're not going to run into on a typical desktop Linux system. Also, installing software is quite different, largely due to that read only filesystem.
It's a great user experience, and you can do a fair amount of fiddling, but it's going to be quite different from typical desktop Linux. I love it as a Linux user, and my coworkers that are Windows only also love it and have no desire to use more Linux.
I've only ever used Windows and Apple, but I'm seriously considering giving Linux a go, so it just occurred to me that maybe the Deck would be a good way to get a taste for it amd just see what it's like, even if it's kind of an idiot proof version.
As someone whose deck is their first real experience with a Linux machine, Iβd say so. That first time going into desktop mode I was fearful of what I might find. Then I got a sleek, better looking windows experience and now Iβve got migration plans.
Sure, if you're into gaming.
Well, whadayaknow, I sure am!
Now if Valve can just give us an up-to-date version of SteamOS for desktops...!
Probably have to wait till they have the official general version of steam os out first.
Depending on what the next product is, development might speed up.
Imo the largest thing holding back a desktop (or consolized) steam os is that a majority of the console space wants to be able to play multiplayer games, and the most popular ones have anti-cheat, which imo is the biggest hurdle valve must beat if they want the device to actually sell.
The big anti-cheat tools (BattleEye and EAC) are already compatible. The only remaining problems are a small number of developers that intentionally announced that they will be proactively blocking linux... like Bungie.
Not saying that its all in valves hands, but its a problem valve and the said companies need to discuss in the back room in order to get the ball rolling, regardless.
Valve won't directly support your desktop. I recommend trying out Universal Blue distributions like Bazzite-nvidia or ChimeraOS if you're on AMD graphics. This has worked well enough for me (Nvidia drivers still suck on most Linux distros).
I'm on Debian + GNOME right now, which works fine for me, but I plan on trying out Pop! OS in the next couple weeks. I've put off a long time because it's downstream of Ubuntu and I'm no longer a fan of Canonical's direction.
Why? Just install Steam and set it to run Big Picture Mode and you're done. I personally don't want a locked-down OS by Valve as my daily driver...
The Steam Deck is a handheld gaming computer developed by Valve and released on February 25, 2022. The device uses Valve's Linux distribution SteamOS, which incorporates the namesake Steam storefront. SteamOS uses Valve's Proton compatibility layer, allowing users to run Windows applications and games.
This doesn't sound like a valid option for desktop PC users. Do other linux OSs have something similar?
You can install proton on any linux distro. I game AAA on my arch distribution. Look into Heroic Launcher.
You can just use any distro that runs Steam and set steam to use Big Picture Mode for a similar experience. There are gaming specific distros like ChimeraOS, Nobara, Pop!_OS, Garuda, etc. though.
Yeah, https://chimeraos.org/ or https://rhinolinux.org/ or https://garudalinux.org/
But any linux with modern hardware really. I play games on my desktop (and get work done too) with EndeavourOS (which is an easy to install and maintain version of Arch Linux, which is also the base of SteamOS. With Arch Linux you have bleeding edge updates, like new Linux kernel versions. SteamOS slows that down, only letting in those bleading edge updates after they've vetteed it on the SteamDeck hardware).
Steam takes care of proton support. You can try to support other store fronts with applications like Lutris, that try to apply that compatibility layer to those games.
a year and a bit spent on the steam deck makes me wonder if daily driving linux would be all that hard. i've tried before but was always bounced off by the stupidest little things, like not being able to find wi-fi drivers or whatever. but nowadays i'm starting to think all that is worth it to be off windows
Wi-Fi drivers? Most should be supplied by the kernel. Do you have obscure Wi-Fi hardware?
Laptops with Realtek wifi often sucks monkey balls. I swapped mine for an Intel one to get rid of dropped packets.