this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
384 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

37696 readers
175 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While WEI is thankfully cancelled, it's not entirely cancelled... They're planning on making it available still in WebViews with the intention that websites can check if a malicious Android app is trying to do a phishing scheme.

Seems like such a niche "security" feature... what are they really trying to accomplish here? Something seems fishy to me

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 132 points 1 year ago (5 children)

this is not cancellation. This is Google taking a step back, and regroup to attack back.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its a common practice to do exactly that. Just demand something very absurd and let people rage about it, then "step back" to "please the masses" while in reality your "step back" idea is the thing you actually wanted to do from the beginning on. But now people are happy about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I learned that as a negotiation tactic. Pick the number you want to get, then ask for more. The counter will likely be around what you wanted!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

They care about one thing only: Money.

Obviously this is more of a strategic retreat and nothing else. It's also a very common tactic to push for something crass, pull back, wait a bit and repeat. Most commonly resistance gets weaker each time, because people are people.

Now if anyone thinks they made money with a retreat and won't try again, because it's obviously much more lucrative, which stone exactly are you living under?

You are 100% correct. Nothing is won till you make it impossible for Google to push forward or destroy their motivation for trying again later.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the old Unity Trick™.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If they can't storm the front door, then try to sneak in through the back door I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Ha, I didn't know there's a name for that, but it's definitely what I assume they're going to do. My initial reaction was to wonder what they'll now present as the "reasonable" option to WEI.

Considering they're rolling it out in Android, maybe they'll just wait a moment and then integrate it into desktop Chrome as well, just without any of the fanfare?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing that people are calling out their deception.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would never agree with what Google proposes, though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You may not, but you'd be surprised with how many people didn't even care about WEI, let alone whatever the reasonable option will be

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

They grew thanks to the open internet where everyone let them scrape their website’s content. They can’t let anyone do that again.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure it isn't. * Wink wink nudge nudge*

It'll be back. With a different name and modified messaging.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That probably would've been true even if they did follow through.

[–] gentooer 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago

Specifically, everyone who's not using Chrome and its derivates did it. Use Firefox, people.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

That's what Google want you to believe, forget about and step back. It's not over yet. We just stopped the first wave and it will get harder with each wave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@dean @rysiek For now... they'll bring it back with a new coat of paint and a new name within the next year.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

@4censord @dean @rysiek I can see where they could integrate and feature creep to what they really likely want, but in terms of webviews this would likely be beneficial for security.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They want to put it on the default webview in android, which doesn't seem like a huge deal to me. It would basically let apps that use webview for things like logging in beef up their security.

It's not like the entire concept of this API was bad, it's just that with Google's proposed implementation companies would abuse the fuck out of it to do bad things. Not having it in browsers pretty much eliminates that while still letting things like banking apps enjoy some of the benefits.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@dean @lisamelton One of the reasons I don’t use Chrome. Here, they’ve revealed what they are working towards. They’ll try again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

@kevinbhayes @dean You are correct. They will try again. 💯

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People here really can't just accept a win

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

A win is when we have forced them to abandon the wretched plan. Them taking it elsewhere with a different name, only to be brought back in the future isn't a win - it's more or less the folly the Trojans committed with the Greek wooden horse.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm convinced people on Lemmy just want to be miserable all the time.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have won the battle, but the war is not over. If one is tired, he or she could employ escapism. But don't blame or poke those, who don't do that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. It's getting integrated into Android WebView.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Daaamn poor GrapheneOS devs...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As someone who uses GrapheneOS but knows very little about the technical side of things, what implications does this have for the OS? I'll actually just not use a smartphone anymore if I'm going to be forced back onto the privacy nightmare that is stock Android.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They will strip out the DRM part, maybe. GrapheneOS, other than even Firefox or any Linux Distro, has many DRM packages installed. Widevine and lots of others.

So it may be that they dont even remove it from the Vanadium Webview. But if they do, Apps may break as the Developers looove the extra control. And then GrapheneOS needs to do annoying work again, to for example have a sandboxed Webview-DRM app that can be enabled per-App.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I don't know about graphene, but doesn't some android roms allow to use custom ( more private Webview implementations) instead of default ?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

the concept is good in theory; the reasoning was not.

load more comments
view more: next ›