this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
272 points (93.9% liked)

News

23014 readers
13 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 year ago

Fuck you bud, our unit was more productive remote and we had the metrics to prove it.

Unfortunately, data doesn’t trump tiny minds who need to manage people in person, or obviate the type of bullshit rumors billionaires and those invested in commercial real estate tend to peddle.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

Oh hey, look, another bag holder claiming that the contents of their bag are super important!

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How would he even know? Did he run some comparative numbers between employees working from home and those that didn’t during the same time period? Or is he just making shit up?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

He knows because it is in his best interest for it to be so.

As remote work is going to decimate the commercial realestate market.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

The answer will shock you!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

He's doing the same shit Elon does and is just pulling random bullshit out of his ass that makes his opinion sound less absolutely fucking stupid than it really is.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

Fortune and Bloomberg ran this story. It's collusion. Bunch of old rich friends and neighbors pumping each others profits.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Our company posted record profits with everyone working from home. Maybe your guys just weren't working smarter, not harder.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Listen, all I am saying is that if all the billionaires disappeared over night, if you avoided mass communication media you would probably not know. If you took that same amount of collective wealth from the bottom up human society would collapse.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

I'm willing to bet every single one of them worked more than he did.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has he been to an office before? Just because you're in an office doesn't mean you're "working hard." Lots of people do random web browsing, online shopping, etc., while at work and on the clock. Typical belief of old timers. They think your presence at a desk is somehow a magical indicator of a hard worker.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another person that needs to "factory reset his life" and "start a new file" like the rest of us, without money and connections.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

New game minus.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No conflict of interest here folks.

Not like there's murmurs about a commercial real estate crash looming due to remote work being super effective and there being no reason what so ever for CEOs to have these gigantic castles with thousands of serfs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So glad my company downsized offices this last year. We're like 80-90% remote (I still haven't even been to the state my office is in), so there was no reason to keep a big office building that was mostly empty.

It's amazing what a company can do when they care about their employees more than a stack of bricks with shit in them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't go as far as to say they care about employees, there are plenty economical reasons to do so, the fact it gels with happy employees is pure happenstance..

The difference is when the drive to maximize money is greater than the need to lord over people.

That is, unless the company owns the real estate and buildings themselves, then the fear the value of the property will tank is another overriding factor that sets them against WFH.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the reality is that if companies have remote employees, they dont need commercial real estate. if companies dont need commercial real estate, a GIANT BUBBLE that will dwarf the subprime fuckups in 2008 happens & tens of billions of dollars in commercial real estate will rapidly lose value. anyone holding that property will see their assets plummet like someone jumping out of the 70th floor of a Wall St building.

if anything, the pandemic taught us that 90%+ of employees who could work in an office downtown (or wherever) can work just as well at home. Schwarzman's ass is on the line.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

OR . . . OR they can convert them to luxury living spaces in the heart of the city for beaucoups de bux.

But fantastically stupid comments like the real estate magnate is making here in the article will be the kicking and screaming before that happens.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you're not wrong, they totally could - but not at a profit margin the board/stockholders will accept. really glad I dont have any investments in commercial real estate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

What about defense, water, food, medicine?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Converting a commercial building to residential use isn’t that easy. For one the plumbing is very different for commercial use and not easily converted for residential. Either way this billionaire can get bent, remote work is better in every measurable way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fully automated luxury everyone space Communism sounds good.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Ssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhocking!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Harder to trick employees to do the work of two other employees in remote format.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Even assuming that what he claim is true and can back with evidence, he would need to go further and show that loss of productivity caused by remote working is massive enough to: offset cost of borrowing commercial real estate (Or much larger real estate with corresponding maintenance bill in case on-site location is need for other reason), paying employee transportation, giving up remote talent, etc.

It is entirely his fault for not preparing for the time where people will actually bring out calculator when there was moon-sized sign post for several years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Fucking right. And I would love to inform him we're still not at even 80% now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Past time to eat...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Any archive for this pw?