this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023

106 points (96.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43818 readers

900 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

106

How does Lemmy/Mastodon/Fediverse store videos and images? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 year ago by Blurker to c/[email protected]

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As I was browsing lemmy and the fediverse at large, this question kept popping into my head.

Since multimedia files have a much bigger footprint than raw text, it made me feel worried since as time goes, massive resources will be needed to keep up with the big data coming in.

I do wonder if the instances have taken the route of the cloud and just decided to put all of it in something like AWS S3? Or maybe they use self hosted storage with something like minio for object storage?

top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

This will differ greatly from instance to instance. The people running lemmy.world have published some info on their infrastructure. My instance is running on a rather small VPS with 100GB storage, but I will have to rethink my solution rather soon as images and videos from my subbed communities [Edit: which are stored on outside sites] are eating around a gigabyte per day and I think this is likely to increase.

Edit: I want to clarify that I was partially wrong - Lemmy only locally caches content which is hosted on outside sites (e.g. imgur). It does not cache content that was directly uploaded to another Lemmy instance and just embeds the source media.

[–] Blurker 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for your work for the community! I think with more people using lemmy, we should also as users lookout for the infra we are using because the admins are not a mega corporation ready to spin up infinite resources.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No need to thank me, currently I am the only non-bot-user of my instance and do not allow registrations 😅

Many of the bigger instances have links to donate to their operators, but I am doubtful that relying solely on donations will be enough in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since you’re the only one, you might consider setting an expiration on the media so your local storage serves as more of a cache. Like, I’m sure you’re far more likely to revisit a recent thread than a super old one, and as long as the original instance is still around you could redownload the media. This might require software patches though idk

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Firstly: I was partially wrong about what gets cached, see my original comment.

There is an open pull request which is meant to give some options regarding media serving. Right now it's only a rough sketch though and does not implement a lot functionality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was my understanding that images stayed on the source server and only thumbnails were "federated".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was partially wrong about what is cached and updated my comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the update. I was concerned. Tho I still need to figure out how to manage that storage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Maybe have users use an outside image provider, like imgchest or gfycat or whatever?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Gfycat is shutting down, sadly. There’s no money to be had in hosting pictures and videos for other sites that are viewed without ads. We already saw the Imgur clamp down a month or so ago. If these instances can’t self host the content it’s all going to have an invisible expiration date.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the best idea in my opinion. Even on Reddit people used Imgur a bunch. It would be cool if either Lenny itself, or the various apps that have sprung up tied into an API for Imgur or similar to store pictures/videos, then it would be seamless to the end user.

EDIT: looks like Memmy on iOS actually already does this!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I was wrong about what gets cached: media that is hosted directly on remote instances is not cached, while media from outside sources (imgur etc.) is cached and served from that cache.

So, from a small instance's point of view, the best case scenario would be if everyone used Lemmy's own media hosting exclusively. But that would, of course, greatly increase the storage requirements of larger instances.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The issue is that if they shut down or change policies we get bit rot. Idk though it’s starting to sound pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly you may benefit from a cloud system that can put old images into cold storage when they go unaccessed for more than a few days

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it caching the entire image from the post or just the thumbnail?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Everything. It does some re-encoding when it retrieves content from other instances and you can set limits for pictrs (the software Lemmy uses to host media) regarding file sizes etc.

Edit: I was partially wrong about what is cached, see my original comment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I need to look more into pictrs and what it can do. Is this done on purpose for image redundancy? I get the reason if the original instance goes offline then I'd still have a copy but maybe I don't really want a copy? Also would be nice if I could get it to convert everything to webp

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I think by default it already converts everything into webp. The repo will have more information on how it all works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I was looking into hosting my own instance I thought I saw an option to disable media file replication entirely so that they would always have to be fetched from their home instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would be great to know, any chance you remember where you read that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's possible that I've misunderstood. And it's also important to note that I was looking into this for the purposes of creating my own, single user instance. I wasn't planning on posting to my own instance, just using it as a single logon where I could control what other instances I federated with.

Here it mentions not installing pict-rs and removing its configuration if you don't need image hosting. My interpretation at the time was that it would mean that no images would be hosted locally on my instance. But that was very early on before I understood more about federation, and now I realize that it may in fact also mean that any content coming from federated instances could have images broken, not that it would load the images from the remote instance. So now, I no longer think that this is a solution for not syncing images, but I'm not at all sure of that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, but I bet I could find it again if I hadn't just imagined it and made it up for this comment. Give me a few.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Edit: I am partially wrong. (See below)

They're stored on their host Instance. Only text is copied across instances.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That is not true. As long as a user on your instance is subscribed to a community, the media content of posts [Edit: only posts linking to outside sources, e.g imgur] of that community is stored locally on your instance as well.

This, of course, only applies to media which is uploaded to Lemmy, links to media hosted externally are not downloaded.

See this issue for more context.

Edit: I want to clarify that I was partially wrong - Lemmy only locally caches content which is hosted on outside sites. It does (should?) not cache content that was directly uploaded to a Lemmy instance and just embeds the source media.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think this could be a ticking DOS time bomb.

Someone manages to spam upload massive files to the largest Lemmy instances could wipe out a ton of smaller ones.

Not to mention scalability wise this seems like a nightmare… eventually the largest Lemmy instances will have petabytes of media data with 100s of gbs coming in per day, giving other instances no chance to sync with them.

I think the system architecture needs a significant review. This won’t scale.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. It's also a tremendous waste of resources. I'm all for redundancy (like CDNs), but this seems incredibly poorly thought out. If Lemmy (as a whole) every scales to the size of other social media, the space requirements will start to become unreasonable.

Why wouldn't something like symlinks be implemented? Not saying specifically use symlinks, but there has to be a similar, better way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The obvious way would be to just not cache content locally and always link to the source instance. While this would concentrate the strain immensely, it would also greatly decrease the storage space used by all other instances.

There might also be other viable alternatives such as using a CDN and having it selectively cache content which is requested often etc.

~~As of now, Lemmy does not support either, though. ~~

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like the developers should spend some time adding features to reduce malicious activity. They could provide settings to the admins to limit the number of things one user can do in a day, like number of images, total size of images, number of communities created, etc. Sure, someone could create multiple accounts, but it would still make it harder to attack Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Agree. If I'm not mistaken, you can only disable the caching of sensitive (NSFW) content on your instance by disabling NSFW in general. This doesn't go for SFW content though.

It shouldn't be very hard to do this for all content though, if I find the time I might look into implementing this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mentioned something akin to this possibility a couple days ago, but was told this likely wasn’t the case. I’ll have to see if I can dig up the argument for that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This actually brings up another question for me! Say your account is on an instance that doesn't allow something, like nudity. If you subscribe to a community on another instance that DOES allow it, you're saying that everything you see there does end up (redundantly) hosted by your home instance. Has the Lemmy moderation/admin community in general decided on whether or not that's breaking the home instance's rules?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Right now you can only disable caching of nsfw content by disabling NSFW for the instance, but of course this has nothing to do with "soft" rules that are only written out in text.

Imo the best solution would be to allow admins to have more granular control over caching, e.g. disabling caching for specific instances / communities or whitelisting. And we need an option to disable caching altogether.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What??? Why? I'll have to shut my instance down if that's true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I updated my comment as I was partially wrong about what gets cached.

[–] Blurker 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds good for reliability since an instance can still lookup posts even if another fails.

For videos and images, do they store them as blobs in the database or do they use something more catered to files like object storage or maybe a regular filesystem with metadata on a database?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They use pict-rs which looks like it was file system, but is now object storage

[–] Blurker 2 points 1 year ago

That's an awesome name. The Rust community never fails to deliver lol

load more comments