Iβd rather lose my headphones then have one earbud staring at me every day, silently accusing me of losing its mate.
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
20 points (91.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43894 readers
1416 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Why the hell would you want both?
Also, you can use neckbands until they're fully drained of battery and instantly wear the earpieces whenever needed. Wireless earbuds require you to wait until the buds have drawn enough power from the case after each listening session.
I'm sorry but neckbands need to be charged as well, no?
Many of them can charge while in use.
TWS because I preferred bluetooth to not deal with cables.
Neither.
Bone conduction headset. Shokz OpenRun or OpenComm. Nothing in the ears, nothing on the neck.
I have the OpenRun Pro (mostly for work) and love it. Being able to listen to music or whatever without blocking yourself from the outside world, and without having something in your ears (I generally don't care for earbuds) is fantastic. It's my "daily driver" but there are a couple downsides:
-
Sound quality is totally listenable, but not audiophile level. Think a pair of Sound blaster computer speakers from 1995. They get the job done for casual use, and for many people that's all you need
-
Some people aren't a fan of the "tickling" when listening at high volumes, especially where there's bass. My dad helped me out with some stuff and I tried to gift him a pair, but he stuck with his wired behind-the-head earbuds because he just didn't care for the sensation when he tried mine. I don't have a problem with it, but my hearing may be a little better so I can get by with lower volumes
-
If you're in a noisy environment and want to block out the noise, this is a terrible option. I tried using it on an airplane and could hardly hear anything
If none of those bother you, Shokz is a fantastic option for sure.
If you're in a noisy environment and want to block out the noise, this is a terrible option. I tried using it on an airplane and could hardly hear anything.
I mostly agree with your other two points, but not this one. You should never try to "cover" noise with louder noise; that is just a recipe for hearing loss. Instead, you should be wearing some form of ear protection. Earbuds are not designed to function as hearing protection, nor are most headphones.
With bone conduction, you can wear regular, rated earplugs to block out ambient noise without blocking your audio. I find that I can usually lower my audio volume significantly when wearing earplugs.
I meant general expected background noise where hearing protection may not otherwise be necessary, like an airport or airplane. In those cases, I use my $10 wired earbuds. The silicone alone blocks most noise because it's not at a damaging level, and the sound from that doesn't need to compete nearly as much as a totally open-ear solution like these bone conduction things.
ANC saves me from infant screams.
I recommend chloroform.
What about people with glasses? Can the legs round part be adjusted without pressing against the glasses frames?
It will depend on your specific anatomy and glasses. I wear sunglasses all the time with mine without issue, but my girlfriend said they were a little annoying with her frames.
I have fewer glasses problems with the OpenComm than I did with my Jlab Air Sport buds, which had a hook over the ear.
If I had any complaints, it would be with certain hoods and thick, high collars on jackets.
I have set of Aftershockz and wear glasses every day. No problems here. I guess if your glasses are particularly thick framed they could get in the way but they would have to be very thick frames.
awesome option.
I bought the OpenRun for my bicycle commute. Listening to podcasts without the danger of blocking out traffic noise is just neat.
I prefer TWS. My last neckband pair were always getting caught on my clothing and long hair.
The comfort and convenience of TWS is hard to beat. The Pixel Buds series A are amazing for the price.
It's harder for me to lose a neckband
For podcasts (not music) I like a single wireless Bluetooth headphone so that I can pay attention to the world around me. The audio fidelity isn't that important to me for just listening to people talk.
Depends on what I am listening to and doing. I usually like magnetic neckband headphones if I am moving around and maybe listening to a book, but prefer iems or openbacks if I am listening to music.
TWS - but only if theyβre the kind with those curved plastic pieces that hook around your ear. I donβt trust earbuds not to fall out and get lost.
I've had my Samsung buds Pro for nearly e years, and the only time I've had that issue is when when I hang my head fully upside down. But they've never fallen out, just slipped a tiny bit.
I've had both. I found the neckband more convenient. Just wear the on your neck when not in use. But the cable gave up after 1,5 years. TWS, I lost three earbuds..
Neither. Wired all the way.
thanks for playing
When I buy one, it will be neckband. No chance of getting lost or falling in some manhole or weird place. Also, bigger battery and better build. Also, cheaper than TWS. Did I forget to mention easier to repair, unlike TWS?
Bluetooth earphones will never achieve sound quality of a cabled earphone. So I use a cabled iem.
Never is a bold claim.
Not a bold claim. Wireless will never have the same latency as wired.
How would latency = quality?
Latency is very much part of quality, if there is going to be lag during gaming or media playback. The experience/quality is degraded. Also, none of the wireless gear has bested wired gear till now, and wireless gear needs to be atleast 5-10x expensive than wired to have same or better audio quality.
But never? Maybe with some form of quantum entanglement we'll have instant wireless. I'm no expert on the subject but just to say that there are always possibilities.
I doubt. The paradox is that insane amounts of power will be needed from battery to retain such technology, which is counterintuitive for a portable battery electronic device.
Practically, there is a single strand/channel through which wired power can be transmitted with nearly 0 wastage (pure copper etc.) but wireless tech needs to be radiated either in all directions (old protocols) or in a particular direction with broad enough beams (new protocols), none of which is less wasteful than wired.
Good for you, but that doesn't answer OPs question.
There's always one of these guys in these threads
Same here. And I never have to worry about charging them.
You just need to achieve a sound quality which is pretty much undistinguishable. And current tech is already there. Blame the manufacturers for not using it.