Oh boy, can't wait for more average but poorly managed games!
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
242 points (97.6% liked)
Games
31990 readers
2 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't forget console exclusive.
Or just windows store exclusives..
I'll eat my fine leather hat before I use that dog shit store again.
Keep in mind that that's extra special because I don't own a fine leather hat, so I gotta buy one first.
If you want to eat a leather hat, just do it man. You won’t get arrested. I swear.
This is the real hell
load more comments
(20 replies)
Laws against monopolies don't exist, anymore, eh?
After this deal MS will STILL be in third place.
3rd place in... What? I'm trying to search around to see what you're referring to here, but I can't find anything.
By total market cap, Microsoft already blows these companies out of the water. By just videogame divisions, Sony and Nintendo are way farther ahead because of hardware sales, but that doesn't really make sense to include in the conversation about acquiring a publisher. I can't find any solid numbers either way isolating publishing, other than that the top 5 in recent years seems to be Tencent, Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft, and Activision/Blizzard (with EA hanging around too). Seems like any of those two merging is going to be bad for everyone other than shareholders.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Usually I am against huge mergers like this because they rarely benefit the customer, but ActiBlizzard was about as bad as it gets anyway.
Selfishly I hope maybe at least one decent RTS might come from this before everything gets enshittyfied again.
I realize though that OG Warcraft/Starcraft were not the big motivators for MS so the chance is probably slim.
You should look into Stormgate.
It's an upcoming rts from frost giant studios which consists of some of the original blizzard team responsible for StarCraft.
I actually got a spot in the closed alpha this month.
It feels pretty good so far even though unfortunately I can't play as much as I would like due to my job and aspects of my personal life taking a lot of time right now.
I plan on getting at least a couple more games in this weekend.
That's cool. I was never very good myself but I'd like to play around in the noobs ranks. I just hope there's a good story mode.
Microsoft still supports AoE2, and that game is going on 22+ years. Some of the other stuff they've released has been a bit hit and miss, but they at least tried to do something fresh.
I'll take that over ActiBlizz dropping support for the SC2 pro scene for no good reason other than "profitability" any day.
Hell, maybe they can fix WoW classic while they're at it, and say what you will about the guy but if I understand correctly even Chris Metzen is coming back.
Out of all these studios I suppose I like Microsoft's games the most, but I still think it's bad that the regulators didn't shoot down this merger from the view of competitiveness.
I don't think the gaming market is healthy when only a handful of corporations like Microsoft, Ubisoft, EA Games and SquareEnix hold what I assume to be 75% of the gaming AAA market. It restricts creativity and stifles competition and the ones paying the price are going to be us consumers.
Even worse if they go and start vendor locking games to Windows, which sucks for us Linux gamers or Xbox which sucks for Playstation gamers.
How many new AAA studios could be created from scratch with this money?
Not too mention losing all the devs who'll probably leave due to the nether anyway.
Rip
Blizzard was already dead
I mean for gamers in general. This merger will not benefit consumers.
Activision Blizzard was already about as anti-consumer as possible, so in this particular case at worst nothing will change, at best Microsoft might actually clean house and there might be some improvements for the consumers...
I genuinely love your optimism.
Microsoft will use this purchase to further restrict releases to non Xbox consoles, no matter when they agree to to industry bodies. It is in Microsofts interest to only release on their platforms as releasing to PS or Switch will cost them in Xbox purchases.
Yeah, sorry, I was thinking from a PC standpoint and sort of ignored the whole console perspective (though, frankly, the console market seems to have been absolutely fubared from its inception, from a consumer standpoint, so anything Microsoft does will probably be as relevant as farting into an ocean of shit...)
Yeah but game production isn't about the consumers. It's a business.
load more comments
(3 replies)
They've been dead since Activision needed with them.
I didn’t even get D4 yet (but planned to) and all my friends have stopped playing it already ☠️ I don’t think they have anything else up their sleeve at this point. Seems they haven’t made anything new since warcraft.
Overwatch was amazing under Jeff.
You say this, but Jeff was there when they started OW2. He was the one who even announced it and their plan to forcibly replace Overwatch.
And he also stated that he had to fight for even the most basic beneficial things.
He also left not long after.
All signs point to them not listening to him due to greed.
Oof sorry I forgot about that one.
They are still pumping money like crazy though.
D4 was dead the moment they announced D2R. Why would I pay $80 for a game with microtransactions and battlepass when I can pay $50 for a game that comes complete in box?
They should have taken D2R kept the mechanics and just rolled new classes, maps, and items.
I don't want a new game, I just want more content.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›