this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
110 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

69600 readers
3312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google teamed up with Samsung once again to build the Tensor G3, the chipset that powers the new Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro. It comes out of Samsung’s 4nm foundries and features a 9-core CPU (1x Cortex-X3 + 4x A715 + 4x A510) and an ARM Mali-G715 GPU.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Personally, I stopped caring about benchmarks years ago. Real world usability and, more importantly, battery life are what make or break a phone for me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I don't really care about benchmark, however I care about modem specs and hardware and the 8 modem is definitely lacking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Benchmarks could become interesting in seven years when the Pixel 8 will still get software support. Making this big promise and starting off with this mediocre SoC is either brave or....not very foreseeing.

That's quite a bottleneck and efficiency can't tackle every software challenge from here to the year 2030.

Wasn't there already a feature or two that the "old" Pixel predecessor won't receive?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Woah, so that's nearly half the FPS compared to SD8Gen2, and about 3/4th of Gen1. :/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Funny how one of the criticisms against the Xiaomi 13T Pro I posted about a few days ago was the Dimensity 9200+ SOC.

I've never heard anybody complain about the SOC in Pixel phones.

Yet the Dimensity 9200+ SOC in the Xiaomi 13T Pro is way faster and more efficient than Tensor G2 in the Pixel 7, and remains faster and more efficient than Tensor G3 in the Pixel 8. In fact it's only beat by Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 on Android.

"except for the SOC" https://lemmy.world/post/6513457 Top comment, 9 upvotes?

But no one comments about the way weaker SOC for the Pixel phone?!?!

https://lemmy.world/post/6286959?scrollToComments=true

So a slightly weaker SOC in the Xiaomi 13T Pro than the absolute best in any Android phone is worse, than a way worse SOC in the Pixel 8 Pro that is way more expensive?

The Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3 doesn't even match the 2 years older Snapdragon 8 gen 1 which came out in q4 2021.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are a multitude of reasons I personally wouldn't buy a Xiaomi, most notable of which is data security concerns. But the SOC performance isn't one of them.

I wonder if you got hit with a little corporate astroturfing? I doubt there are many corps on Lemmy yet but if your post is findable by a search engine it's only a matter of time before they arrive, if they haven't already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Maybe bad perception? Mediatek for a long time produced a bunch of cheap chips. Kinda like if UniSoc produced a Snapdragon 8 G2 killer, I think plenty will be sceptical, me included.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yes I understand some may have security concerns, we debated that too, that's not the point here. The point was specifically the criticism of the SOC, which IMO is absolutely stellar.

I'm surprised there is absolutely zero criticism in a major thread on the Pixel 8 here with 145 posts. When the Tensor chips are clearly worse on both speed and efficiency? Considering how much attention the issue got regarding the Xiaomi 13T Pro, despite it's both cheaper and has a way better SOC.

Maybe astroturfing is an issue, but it is illegal in almost all countries, so I hope not.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Performance I don't give a shit.

But efficiency I care a lot especially in a laptop. Much more on the phone.

Pixel 5 with a 3 year old mid range SoC can run android 14 UI at 90 FPS pretty much fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's a perspective I didn't consider

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah so for Pixel 8 you just need a bit more for 120Hz instead of 90Hz.

A different story is for gaming. But for mobile gaming I'm more a fan of Steam Deck or Nintendo Switch. Devices that have higher TDP.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Please just use snapdragon and I’ll buy a pixel

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They won't. They used to do that prior to the 6. They are able to offer longer support and they claim more features (AI and camera mostly I think) this way.

[–] JDubbleu 1 points 2 years ago

I thought it was marketing BS at first, but the responsiveness of AI related tasks on my Pixel 7 is much better than any phone I've ever used. Voice-to-text is almost never wrong, and processes just as fast as you speak. The photo editing, OCR, Lens search, and all the other random features that are time and time again extremely useful are snappy as hell.

I don't play games on my phone outside of BTD6 and random ones when I'm bored on an airplane, but they've all ran fine without hitching. At the top end the phone is behind, but it's just not my use case to run games at 200 FPS on mobile.

Pixels have always been a software first phone with features that seem niche but actually turn out to be extremely useful. This is the first phone I've had that I can use to improve my interactions with the real world in a meaningful way, and it's very clear that is the direction the Pixel is heading towards.

I've only used the live translate feature once, but when I did it felt magical. I was able to communicate with someone who only spoke Mandarin, in English, almost as fast as if we both spoke a common language. It's probably the closest thing we have to a universal translator device and it was awesome.

With that said I'm one person, and I completely understand some people need a powerful phone, but I think for most the processor is more than enough, and they could benefit from the extra features.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why, what's wrong with their chip - genuine question? Something can only get better through iterative design and refinement.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't care about gaming performance on a phone, but battery life in Pixel 7 have been worse than in competitors like Galaxy S23.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This Tensor G3 chip doesn't even match the 2 years older Snapdragon 8 gen 1 from 2021.

There are cheaper phones with way better SOC like the new Dimensity 9200+ Which is both faster and more efficient.

The Pixel Phone is a cool phone in some ways, but the SOC absolutely isn't on par with what other companies have. At best it would be ranked fourth after Apple, Qualcomm and Mediatek who are all way ahead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Better at what though. I think it's all relative. I've had no set backs I can ever think of using my Pixels. Image processing I guess could be quicker, but is that really a deal breaker?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Either faster or more power efficient. Compared to the Pixel 8 Pro / Tensor G3, there are options that are better at both.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Efficiently does nothing? Could be worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You're right it definitely isn't exciting news though