Just looking up what 'preproduction' actually means : They are in the planning stages, but they haven't started 'making' the game yet. Cyberpunk (1) development took four years.
this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
535 points (97.5% liked)
Games
38840 readers
1755 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here and here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Good. We need more dicks in video games.
hell yeah
mount your friends
I don't care.
Shut up about the game.
Don't fucking say a thing about it until its like 6 months from launch.
Did they learn nothing from last time?!
You can start any time, for example ignore the news?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Nice, only 12 more years to go.
Me here just waiting to also not play the next one.
It's just another flavor of starfield but somehow so much more shittier. Make me a game that doesn't release looking like it's a beta release. Then I may be interested.
cyberpunk has nothing to do with starfield.
largely seamless world, fun combat, hand crafted locations, good writing, good story, good and memorable characters, engaging dialogs, multiple ways to finish quests, cool vehicles, and on and on...
oh and forget forcing the player to fast travel everywhere but traveling around in cyberpunk is actually fun so i pretty much never used it in the game despite having the option.
and it looks like no one directed any part of starfield, it's literally the same as oblivion in terms of how every encounter and dialog unfolds, while starfield actually has direction and variety, well acted and performance captured interactive scenes. here's a good comparison of two similar quests involving a trade with shady people. just compare how the lines are delivered, how dynamic the scenes are, what happens when threats are involved, whether the scenes have any development, what you can see when the boxes are opened, literally everything.
It’s just another flavor of starfield but somehow so much more shittier
How do you know if you haven't played it?
You won't play cyberpunk cause it released in a poor state? Its a different game now.
In fairness is was full jank on release, the initial patches got it to "bethesda jank" where it was fun with the bugs (provided you could actually play it) but still bug ridden.
It got better over time, until just before the "big patch" came in that fully changed how it all worked skills and mechanics wise (gameplay was mostly the same).
Honestly i prefer, pre-"big patch" but the fully patched game is considerably smoother and more coherent.
So, aside from the years of post release development, completely missing features that are never actually coming (looking at you full transit system), it's actually pretty good.
An absolutely dogshit way of releasing a game, but if you waited for a few years and bought it on discount , it's actually a really fun game (provided you like that sort of thing).
TBC I'm not justifying anything about this process , it was a major fuckup and many other dev houses would have gone under from the weight of how badly they fucked it up, but they had that witcher money, so.
I will put it on my calendar for 2035.
By the time Cyberpunk 2 comes out, I’ll have my own Keanu installed in my brain.
You won't get Keanu. You'll get trump
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hopely, this game's launch is better then the first one.
Shouldn't be hard unless the bar fell into an open hole in the ground
Looking forward to playing this in 10 years
view more: next ›