Senal

Wait, seriously....no..that can't possibly be true...

You do understand that the word trump exists outside of the name.... Right?

Oh my, im glad you didn't read the rest of it, so many complicated words.

Good luck, you are absolutely going to need it

You probably want to keep to DM's if you don't want conversation on a public message board.

Though I suppose a demonstrated lack of understanding of how public message boards work gives me my answer so, thanks.

Mathematically, probably yes.

Ethically and morally, debatable.

If you are going to be basing arguments on statements of fact your comparison should be factual.

One is subjective opinion and one is relatively objective fact ( assuming actual correctness and there not being some weird exception like a subset language or something ).

Unless you are personally the global arbiter of what is and isn't homophobia, in which case ignore me.

To be clear, i'm asking a very specific question about a very specific statement.

when you say :

So, yay for you! You got fat by stuffing your giant mouth in an attempt to fill the hole in your brain, and lost the weight. Congratulations. It still has nothing to do with the current state of understanding of human metabolism.

Are you claiming that basic CICO, which is peer reviewed science has "nothing to do with the current state of understanding of human metabolism."

or was that just poor phrasing ?

Describe "real" rationality ?

I genuinely can't infer what you mean from that statement.

That's a lot of words to say "my beliefs trump basic science".

Peer review reproduction is a bit of a shambles tbh, so not the silver bullet people make it out to be in some fields, agreed.

So let's leave the science aside for now and focus on what you are proposing.

"Just eat less" is about as productive as "Just don't be sad" or "Just stop drinking alcohol", technically correct but woefully inadequate as a practical solution for most people.

edit: before you get even more angry i'm not saying that eating less and exercising more doesn't work, actually read the statement.

Aside from anecdotes and "trust me bro", what knowledge have you shared so far, what solutions ?

I'm legitimately willing to listen to something you can even halfway prove.

That's a problem for sure if you are using it to insinuate that homosexual relationship are bad.

That's not what is happening here though, which you know ofc.

Being left or right doesn't change what a false equivalency is neither does describing each side in more detail.

This is

"I'm a left winger, the smooth mostly round seeded fruit that shares a name with the color orange is in fact the same as the road vehicle with four wheels, commonly used for transportation of goods that we normally call a car or 'automobile' in the old days"

I mean, I can list the false equivalencies if you like?

To clarify im not saying the point I think you're trying to make is incorrect (though I do disagree with it), I'm saying you're doing a bad job of making it.

If you are going to try and put forth or defend a position don't do it with faulty logic and/or fallacies.

[Attenborough voice]

"And here we see a wild false equivalency in it's natural habitat. Camouflaged and perfectly suited to it's environment, it goes unnoticed by many"

"Some humans have started recording the mating calls of this and other closely related cousins in the misinformationum ridiculosus family in hope of harnessing the power of the sounds for themselves, results have been varied"

That sounds exhausting, but potentially hilarious.

I think you can be banned instance wide but i have no idea what kind of shit you'd need to pull to warrant that kind of punitive action.

As far as i know blocking only works one way as well, as in , if they block you they can't see you, but you can still see them.

Very weird.

Just had a quick look, up to about 4 hours ago they were still playing their solo game of cards against humanity with their own custom deck consisting entirely of fallacies, dogwhistes and scientifically inaccurate "facts".

So, at least they are consistent ...i suppose.

It's like watching one of those grown-ass men strapped to the gills in munitions throwing an actual toddler tantrum, screaming "I'M FELLING THREATENED" at the 16 year old cashier because they won't accept their SovCit note as payment.

Entertaining, but somehow still sad.