this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
238 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

69545 readers
5064 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft promising to build infrastructure in the EU directly hurts American jobs. :-D lol Trumps Tarrifs that scared the world have responded by defending themselves, US companies boosting their economies by building there and then the US jobs will be needed less as the work they're doing now witll be in the EU.

Trumps Tarrifs have directly boosted the economies of others while directly hurting ours and it has absolutely nothing to do with the tangible goods that Trump cares about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Someone should tell Trump that Microsoft is out sourcing cloud business which is worth BILLIONS.

[–] ICastFist 3 points 2 hours ago

Amazon too, tell him Jeff Bezos is the biggest cloud seller on earth. Elon would jump at the chance to deal with his, uh, rival?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Just checked it's worth almost $800 BILLION.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Y'all, I gotta admit I'm really starting to feel old. I still do not fully believe that cloud hosting is the answer for everyone. For businesses of certain sizes, I think running your own stuff and maintaining that IT knowledge within your org is invaluable, but I'm just an IT gremlin who can't properly articulate his thoughts.

Anyone more knowledgeable care to weigh in?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

In my org email went to shit after they outsourced it and lost the institutional knowledge. Now we suddenly have random things happen, like a second layer of quarantine appearing, and nobody can explain it. Any support request is copy pasted forward and backward to the outsourcing provider. If the outsourcing provider's response makes no sense it's forwarded to you internally none the less, and without comment.

My colleagues tell me that back in the nineties we were running an X.400 email gateway in this very company before it was clear that Internet email would be the one to win the protocol wars. We were at the forefront of email developments then.

And we're still a god damn tech company. We're a registry (not registrar), network provider, security services provider, cloud provider, etc. But email is now apparently too hard for us, it's a sad state of affairs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago

Cloud hosting is not the answer for everyone.

It was a meme sold to the public by people richer than us so we give up even more control while opening another lifeline to our wallets.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

It definitely is not for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, the cloud is a cancer on computing. It may make some sense for large corporations but for small and medium business it takes away their agency. IT staff should be developed and in house coding should be the norm.

Allowing cloud and AI to run everything is a recipe for disaster.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

They keep telling us the cloud allows us to scale. Ok, but why must everything be on it? Surely you could use both. Get our own hardware and if we have a flood of new customers stick the extra ones on the cloud server for a while. It's all just VMs anyway.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

anyone remember the time the city of Munich was fully running on "Limux" until the bavarian greed kicked in and they switched back to Microsoft for 8000 jobs Bill promised them? I am sure the greed will kick in again. People are shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How was switching to MS supposed to create jobs? Genuine question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 38 minutes ago

The CSU is full or such genius'

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I remember. I think I was still on Slashdot back then -- that's how long ago it was.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Under Trump 2.0, some Europeans fear that storing their data in the bit barns of Microsoft, Google and AWS is no longer safe

It never was, and all the laws that were installed to make this appear legal were nothing but meaningless fig leaves.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

It's like people still don't know about Schrems II or the Cloud Act.

Or they somehow seriously think that the EU-US Data Privacy Framework resolves the issues that killed the EU–US Privacy Shield?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think a company in Europe doesn't give a shit that the US government can peek at their data. Their users might care but they certainly don't.

What's new is that they no longer trust the stability of the services long term. What if trump slaps a tariff, or asks Amazon to shut down access, or whatever bullshit passes through his head daily? You wouldn't store your business on Russian servers, and they're starting to realize the same applies to the US.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They have to give s shit, because they are ultimately responsible for the handling (and abuse, if it comes to that) of the data, and as European companies they are in easy reach of the European law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago

Nah, as long as the actual servers are hosted in Europe, you're compliant with GDPR and European law. The European company is not liable if the US government violates the EU-US framework.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago

Techies in Europe – who obviously have a vested interest in unsettling Microsoft stronghold on the market as AWS, Microsoft, and Google have upwards of a 70 percent share of the public cloud sector in the region – previously highlighted the potential dangers of US legislation.

I've mentioned this before as a criticism for Canadian boycotts of the US. Every large Canadian website, even Government and News use US cloud services. Every. One.

Frank Karlitschek, CEO of Nextcloud, told us in March, "The Cloud Act grants US authorities access to cloud data hosted by US companies. It does not matter if that data is located in the US, Europe, or anywhere else."

How was this allowed to happen? The minute that law was passed all sites that use them should have discontinued their contracts. JFC.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 15 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 53 points 15 hours ago

Fuck Microsoft

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago

I just installed Pop!OS :)

[–] [email protected] 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They say they'll fight thing in court as if we trust the courts to even respect the constitution anymore. You sat behind the clown on inauguration day, now reap what you sowed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

are you sure that Microsoft was there with Amazon, Google, Fecesbook and Xhitter?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Europe broke their own procurement laws in order to choose Microsoft for the cloud, its good that tariffs were enough for them to finally follow their own laws.

[–] abrahambelch 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

They should worry about the US switching from Micro$oft while they are at it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Im sorry, this is stupud! Customers are saying, "this service is unsafe, i dont trust my data isnt being used against me!" And their response is, "Dont worry, we habe a 5 point plan to make shure we have the uptime of a waffle-house! Our product will be so easy to access and it will stay that way forever!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago

Well if american tech were trying to provide a service and accumulate customers which they take care of then this would not be an issue. Their current method feels more like rape.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Why would they be nervous without any serious competition for 365?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

This is the stupidest fucking trade war. Trump is an odoot who can’t recognize or understand what a service based economy is. Most of tech and IT is service based.

Services don’t have tariffs so the US made out better in the deal. Now he’s fucked that gig for so much of our companies and people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago

Brad Smith commits org to facing off with US govt in court to protect them

Fuck this bullshit of our government always stepping in to make things unfair for legitimate competition.