It's a 17 year old tool in the world's most popular scripting language. It's effectively had billions of tests run against it.
Python
Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!
π Events
Past
November 2023
- PyCon Ireland 2023, 11-12th
- PyData Tel Aviv 2023 14th
October 2023
- PyConES Canarias 2023, 6-8th
- DjangoCon US 2023, 16-20th (!django π¬)
July 2023
- PyDelhi Meetup, 2nd
- PyCon Israel, 4-5th
- DFW Pythoneers, 6th
- Django Girls Abraka, 6-7th
- SciPy 2023 10-16th, Austin
- IndyPy, 11th
- Leipzig Python User Group, 11th
- Austin Python, 12th
- EuroPython 2023, 17-23rd
- Austin Python: Evening of Coding, 18th
- PyHEP.dev 2023 - "Python in HEP" Developer's Workshop, 25th
August 2023
- PyLadies Dublin, 15th
- EuroSciPy 2023, 14-18th
September 2023
- PyData Amsterdam, 14-16th
- PyCon UK, 22nd - 25th
π Python project:
- Python
- Documentation
- News & Blog
- Python Planet blog aggregator
π Python Community:
- #python IRC for general questions
- #python-dev IRC for CPython developers
- PySlackers Slack channel
- Python Discord server
- Python Weekly newsletters
- Mailing lists
- Forum
β¨ Python Ecosystem:
π Fediverse
Communities
- #python on Mastodon
- c/django on programming.dev
- c/pythorhead on lemmy.dbzer0.com
Projects
- PythΓΆrhead: a Python library for interacting with Lemmy
- Plemmy: a Python package for accessing the Lemmy API
- pylemmy pylemmy enables simple access to Lemmy's API with Python
- mastodon.py, a Python wrapper for the Mastodon API
Feeds
Pip is amazing. It does somethings in seconds that take anaconda over an hour to do.
I'm surprised to hear you say this because in all honesty, pip really sucks as far as package managers go. uv
is a worthy replacement.
I think this is talking about basic functionality, eg. can you do basic stuff with a clean install without everything immediately breaking
There's a lot of programming tools that are primarily developed for and on linux, and "windows support" is an afterthought which will result in linux being a very frictionless experience but windows being a minefield of problems and requiring careful manual setup
Compared to luarocks, pip is amazing.
Maybe so, but pip is years behind package managers like cargo
. It really is not particularly good.
Sure, and Luarocks is behind pip, and it really is particularly bad.
If you're getting gcc errors it sounds like the package you're trying to install contains some c/c++ stuff that needs compiling.
A lot of python packages that rely on things written in c/c++ ship those precompiled, which might account for why it feels easier for you.
Sorry if it was unclear, I constantly get cryptic gcc errors using luarocks a package manager for lua. Its years behind pip.
No, you were clear. That's what I understood you to mean.
Ah, I'm the one who misread, sorry.
Yeah, compiling things from scratch is the norm for lua packages, making them really only work on linux.
pip
cannot install some system dependencies your library might need. Windows is extra difficult sometimes, as the library might require some paths during installation, Linux is way easier for this kind of stuff. Either you use WSL, or you follow these instructions for Windows I found by googling https://github.com/luarocks/luarocks/blob/main/docs/installation_instructions_for_windows.md
I use Mint btw
The instructions don't work half the time.
I'd love to hear a technical answer, but one thing that's probably part of it is the fact that pip is written in Python and Python runs everywhere without much problem (though uv also seems to work pretty flawlessly too lol)
Lua runs everywhere (almost), but I cannot install a uuid library on windows.
IIRC I've had pip fail like that too. Unable to build a lib it included.
Pip does fail sometimes, but its not half as bad as luarocks.
@irelephant do anyone care a thing about windoze? :O
Lack of windows support for most luarocks modules has stopped me from writing a lot of stuff in lua.