this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
765 points (98.6% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2410 readers
725 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

Unless you are gay or trans, then you're pretty much viewed as very 'beatable.'

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean I'd argue 2024 was better than 2025...

[–] ICastFist 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's only thanks to 2024 that we're having 2025, soooo...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, thanks big bang.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suggest “The Way We Never Were” by Coontz if anyone is inclined to read about the sort of manufactured history surrounding American society and particularly the family unit. In some ways the past was better, but we somehow managed to get rid of the good parts, make up parts that never happened, sidestep the bad, and make the present worse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only good parts about the past is that families could be supported on a single income. Pretty much everything else was worse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I’d suggest reading about it before making such a statement. Understand that the single income created its own problems. It kept women isolated thanks to the way postwar housing developed, kept them out of the workforce, dismantled their social network, resulted in suburbs that drove longer commutes, etc. women have had it hard in society for quite a while, but the separated family unit made it harder. These things also dismantled the “village” support network that people had, along with extended family and community that could help people.

Yeah, the wealth that allowed the luxuries of a single family home in the ‘burbs was great, but it came at a price.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why I love vaporwave. It romanticizes the past and criticizes it at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Hypnospace Outlaw is such a great work of pseudo historical fiction. (Or Digital: A Love Story if you want more 80’s than 90’s)

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Just about every time period sucks

The only time period that was enjoyable was only enjoyed by a small portion of the global population at any one time

Many people on this thread like to point out the 80s, 90s or early 2000s were great ... it is true for only about maybe 10% of the global population ... the rest were living with developing nations with very little and everyone still struggling like they always had

The world has always been the same throughout history ... I'm guessing about 70% of the population lived just enough to get by ... 29% lived with absolutely nothing ... and 1% lived with everything

And it's still the same today.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

as someone from a developing nation, the good ol days were good because i was a kid.

i think thats the theme here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

I wish I could go back to the late 80s briefly so I could listen to the morning radio show on CFNY , which was my first introduction to alternative music,while I did my hair like I used to when I was a kid before school, which was always quite a production. I'd like to hear "Song For Whoever" by the Beautiful South come out of my boom box just one more time. But that's all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Rosy retrospection, because memory is selective to the positive.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This works on longer scales, but I have to be honest with you, I don't know if me looking back at the late 90s and going "yeah, that went wrong at some point" is just my generation's version of being nostalgic for a time where you were oblivious to the crappy stuff or a fairly objective assessment of modern world trends.

I DID grow up in what amounted to a developing nation, several of my neighbors couldn't read or write and I didn't have a telephone or a VCR until well into the nineties, but also... you know, the post 9-11 period doesn't seem like a particular uptrend for civilization, in hindsight.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Matrix had it right.

1999, turn of the millenium.

Zenith of human society, all downhill from there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unless you were gay, or female, non-white or lived in Eastern Europe, Asia (minus Japan), India, Africa, South America or Central America.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

... Its still all downhill from here.

I get what you're saying, and you're not wrong in that sense...

But we are heading for / already in the ... general collapse of modern technological society.

Matrix code has too much technical debt?

Real world has too much fragile complexity, too much accumulated and unavoidable environmental destruction, too many cheaply extracted and expended vital resources (leaving only the expensive to extract), and too many mouths to feed, who can only be fed with those now expensive vital resources as part of the food production system.

The actuaries broadly agree with this scenario as well, though their timeline is a bit more optimistic.

https://actuaries.org.uk/planetary-solvency

50% collapse of world GDP in 2070 to 2100, as compared to right now.

We overshot 1.5C last year.

88% of the world's coral reefs are bleached and basically permanently dead.

Hansen's latest climate papers are trying to explain why our climate models have been wrong... in the optimistic direction, fundamental climate sensitivity is actually greater than consensus.

Antarctica melting faster than projections, Artic getting closer and closer to a Blue Ocean event, again faster than expected.

We might have the AMOC collapse in the next 10 years.

Etc.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

They mean the US in the 80s and 90s when we were burning through all of the goodwill and progress made in the prior half century.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Good will? I mean I imagine there was some good will in the aftermath of WW2 but I'm not sure the Truman Doctrine caused a lot of good will.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I just wanna go back, back to 1999

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree. I don't need a historian for this. I remember it, and yeah it definitely wasn't perfect. But I am not convinced I'm sugar coating it through retrospection. Mid to late 90s was peak civilization as far as I can tell.

[–] cactus_head 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

I do if I'm phrasing it like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd prefer a few years earlier, the 90's was rad dude.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Reading through this thread I've realised that we just need to all keep emigrating to the places where it's best every few years.

We need a new thread for current and pay best places to live for now and any time travellers.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Often, when people learn that I love history, they ask me which time I'd prefer to live in.

I always like the face of surprise they make when they hear my answer.

"Today."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I had no significant outside world problems in the 90s and early 2000s.

You could get repair manuals and replacement parts for practically anything, and you could even get away with blowing up ant beds in your yard with improv devices.

Everything seemed to change after Hurricane Katrina though, like the flood waters wiped out all the ant beds I wanted to blow up.. 😢

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

9/11 in 2001 change quite a bit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

One word: dentistry. Medical science in general yeah, but especially dentistry.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Depends on when you are and when you want to return to. I’d be happy with anything between 1992-2000 ce

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

I was pretty depressed in that period, I didn't know it at the time but my parents divorce had more impact than I realized. Only later did I find out that feeling bleak and gray and tired wasn't a normal state of affairs.

Yet I yearn for the idea that things were moving forward. I would have loved to have had my current mindset in that period. It's been hard overcoming depression whilst neocons destroyed the mortality I was lead to believe in under the banner of Fukushimas 'end of history'.

But hey at least my own brain isn't trying to sabotage me anymore and I'm in a relatively good place. So even when personally have my shit in order is essential to support the younger generations and fight the greedy swine who orchestrated the current state of affairs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where is also paramount, where and when. Think about Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

True, I would like to be in the USA in that time. I would not want to be in Kosovo in that time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Idk it's always "we" to go back in time. Nah just me. My preferred moment in history is not gonna be the same as someone elses."we" shouldn't go back to any period, because that's not a one size fits all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’d be fine with going back to a time before the heritage foundation and reganomics

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

That would be moving to a more racist time also with bad economic policy?

load more comments
view more: next ›