No please no. Isn't it also run by just one guy?
The EU should just embrace OpenSuse, it's mature, solid and from Germany.
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
32 points (88.1% liked)
Linux
7058 readers
1005 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Relying on Redhat's Fedora is quite a blunder if they go forward with that choice.
Redhat's already shown us plenty why we shouldn't trust them especially while they're currently still owned and controlled by IBM.
As much as I like fedora, I'm on the suse side.
It should be based on suse because it is european. EU wants to push european it solutions. Fedora would be better than microsoft but it is both linux after all. Both can use kde and gnome. They are not so much different.
Moreover, BSI, Secunet and others already work with suse.
Edit: I should install opensuse myself to put my money where my mouth is. The difference between fedora and opensuse isn't too big for me anyway.
Are there suse based distros, like ublue? https:// osinside.github.io/kiwi/overview.html
https://kalpadesktop.org/ is basend on opensuse MicroOS, a distro with atomic updates. this comes with KDE, there is also a version with gnome of which i forgot the name.
Thx but atomicity is not enough. Fedora with ostree has sharable images which neither nix nor opensuse has.
Nix is still too difficult for the "normal" end user
EU: So, what FLOSS operating system should we adopt on a union-wide level?
Developer 1: Our distro focuses on system- and network-level security
Dev 2: Ours offers customisable user interfaces
Dev 3: We built our own package manager
Dev 4: We have immutable system images
EU: Uh...
Monorail pitchman: Ours is called "EU OS".
EU: Well, that makes our choice all the easier.
Should have called it EurOS. A lost opportunity, just saying.