this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
274 points (98.2% liked)
movies
3469 readers
496 users here now
Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org
Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.
A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome
- Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
- Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
- Trailers
- Posters
- Retrospectives
- Should I watch?
Related communities:
Show communities:
Discussion communities:
RULES
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the titleβs subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.
2024 discussion threads
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There is no original version of Star Wars. G Lucas started changing theatre's. movie while it was still in theatres. He sent an updated sound cut in theatres 90 days after it released.
I'm noticing that, at least in AMC through Fathom Events, they've been showing one Star Wars movie per year. Tickets for Star Wars Episode III are on sale now, so I wonder if next year this will hit the States.
I also wonder how this will compare to existing fan restorations that are available online, and if they'll release some sort of special edition 4K Blu-Ray or something with this on it.
Once had a discussion with some coworkers that legit didn't know the original cut had no Jabba. They were so certain that they actually almost had me convinced for a moment.
Original cut of Ep4 only, right? Because some of the others did have Jabba.
E: oh, I see. Yes. 'Star Wars', as in Ep4. Cool. Yes. No Jabba.
Thereβs only one StarWars maβam and Iβm pretty sure he doesnβt have a CG Dinosaur.
What kind of Mandela effect shit is this?
Iβve spent more time than I would like to admit trying to fact check this. I swear when the special editions came out one of the behind the scenes was about restoring the scene with the fur coat Jabba that had appeared in the first pre-title-crawl version. Now all I can find are references to it being rereleased at least 4 times before the special edition but nothing about scene edits.
I remember they had to edit solo going up as he walked around to simulate him going over his snail tail
Which was a pretty dumb edit because Jabba didn't seem like the kind of guy that would let Solo get away with stepping on him. And Solo would have also known that and not casually stepped on his tail.
Not to mention Jabba also didn't seem like the kind of guy to meet with a smuggler he had a bounty on alone in a random ship bay. Even if Solo wouldn't have been willing to just shoot his debt and bounty away, Jabba couldn't have been sure about it and Solo already wasted a bounty hunter that caught up to him.
Would have been better to just edit the audio to make the other guy a representative of Jabba instead of sticking to the "this is Jabba but filmed before we decided to make him an alien slug so now we need to make it look like Jabba". Even without the tail step, he looks ridiculous walking around like that compared to the massive thing he was just a year or so later, like he's Jabba's younger brother or nephew.
Wait. No jabba at all?
We don't see him until Return of the Jedi.
The remaster shoved in a stupid CGI scene of him in A New Hope.
Han shot first.
Edit: actually read the article
Han shot.
βIβm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be.β
And we want it to be the way we want it to be, and we are the ones who put money in your pocket.
He should be allowed to fulfill his vision. But he shouldn't take away the one that people like.
Is this showing 4k77?
Edit: no, looks like they're showing the technicolor film directly from the BFI National Archive. Similar to the one 4k77 was scanned from.
Reading the article it seems like they're just using a mint condition film reel they've been waiting to arrive for awhile
Only in London π
Oh hell yeah. The new versions with cgi additions are when I started to drift from star wars
The true original, without the text crawl?
The original had the crawl, just not the Episode IV - A New Hope part. Source: I saw it in May 1977.
I want to dig out old forum posts where Lucas fans told everyone that Lucas wasn't lying that there would never be an original release because the original prints were destroyed in the process of making his special editions.
I knew he was a lying fuck, no way in hell the process would destroy the originals unless he was a complete idiot or purposefully did so with the intent to hide history.
As the article says, there are still original distribution prints from 1977 out there, squirreled away in private print collections.
So they might be dragging one of those out for this showing.
As for the original negatives... only Lucas knows.
George Lucas in shambles rn
But who's going to believe that this will be the original original?
London only. Fuck.
London only. Fuck.
Fucking fuck fuck fuck. Damn it.