this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
316 points (86.6% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

7110 readers
149 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't care if it's in a shitposting community, a meme community, or a news community. If the image or text is generated it should be labeled as such, and failing to label it should be grounds to remove the post. AI slop is a plague and its only going to get worse as the tech matures (if it hasn't already peaked).

I'm so tired of having to call it out every time I see it, especially when people in the comments think it's a photoshop work or (heavens help us) real. Human labor has real tangible value that plagiarism machines can't even pretend to imitate and I'm sick of seeing that shit without it being labeled (so I can filter it out).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At the rate it’s advancing, pretty soon you won’t be able to tell which is which.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI slop should be banned in general

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think people should be free to choose whatever they want. But I also think it should be easy for them to make that choice. Currently there’s no easy way to identify all the AI images.

Maybe if we had some sort of intelligent algorithm that could filter things… (I kid. Crowdsourcing tags would probably be easier and more accurate.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As part of training AI you also create a second AI that detects whether something is AI or not. The solution is to use AI to detect AI. However running this on every single image is computationally very expensive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It also only detects images generated using that specific model, so you’d need an entire library of those detectors, which compounds the problem further.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I'm not gonna disagree with that

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with you so hard, I actually have to downvote your post because of community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

I spent hours Photoshopping Elon Musk's face onto Scarlett O'Hara (took so long because I made myself do it with Gimp 3). If I could have done it with AI, the results would likely have been better and that time wasted making a meme is something I won't ever get back.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

It's not wasted completely time... you gained Gimp skills

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

You and the previous^2^ poster who complained about people complaining about AI slop should have a rap battle.

[–] RandomVideos 12 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Is this controversial?

I suggest banning AI images from communities that arent specifically made for AI images

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There is a paradox here, as there are 2 possibilities either

A) AI generated "slop" is obviously bad quality, theirfor a label is unnecessary as it is obvious.

Or

B) the AI generated content looks as good as human creations therfore is not slop and a label is unnecessary.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If someone makes an ai clip of a politician saying something they didn't should we believe it cause the ai was convincing enough?

Really photoshopped images meant to seem as real as possible should be flagged. It sounds ridiculous just because it has become the norm to accept them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

A) Some people are really really bad at noticing AI slop. I’ve seen some really obvious AI generated images with people debating if it’s real or not. Unless those comments were AI and I’m the one who can’t tell…

B) Honestly even good AI generated content should come with a disclaimer IMO.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

*therefore

Even if it looks good, it's slop.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Nah, we're cool. You and I can tell but AI won't. So it will enshitificate it self into uselessness.

We should all strive to cause confusion in all sorts of databases so AI can't unfuck itself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I thought this was the community for unpopular opinions?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is this AI?
I can't ever be sure unless an anal retentive wannabe mod declares so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Google image search

5 years ago

No, it's not AI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I believe gravity exists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Images of me with my wife - Stalin are not AI slop!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Dammit, I hated down voting this because I agree wholeheartedly.

But this is a common sentiment, it just isn't getting reported about as heavily as all the advertising disguised as reporting. Even outside of lemmy, people are bitching about exactly this. Not just online either, and not just tech minded people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

so what AI detection tool should we use to detect it?

load more comments
view more: next ›