At the rate it’s advancing, pretty soon you won’t be able to tell which is which.
Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
AI slop should be banned in general
I think people should be free to choose whatever they want. But I also think it should be easy for them to make that choice. Currently there’s no easy way to identify all the AI images.
Maybe if we had some sort of intelligent algorithm that could filter things… (I kid. Crowdsourcing tags would probably be easier and more accurate.)
As part of training AI you also create a second AI that detects whether something is AI or not. The solution is to use AI to detect AI. However running this on every single image is computationally very expensive.
It also only detects images generated using that specific model, so you’d need an entire library of those detectors, which compounds the problem further.
I'm not gonna disagree with that
I agree with you so hard, I actually have to downvote your post because of community.
I spent hours Photoshopping Elon Musk's face onto Scarlett O'Hara (took so long because I made myself do it with Gimp 3). If I could have done it with AI, the results would likely have been better and that time wasted making a meme is something I won't ever get back.
It's not wasted completely time... you gained Gimp skills
You and the previous^2^ poster who complained about people complaining about AI slop should have a rap battle.
Is this controversial?
I suggest banning AI images from communities that arent specifically made for AI images
There is a paradox here, as there are 2 possibilities either
A) AI generated "slop" is obviously bad quality, theirfor a label is unnecessary as it is obvious.
Or
B) the AI generated content looks as good as human creations therfore is not slop and a label is unnecessary.
If someone makes an ai clip of a politician saying something they didn't should we believe it cause the ai was convincing enough?
Really photoshopped images meant to seem as real as possible should be flagged. It sounds ridiculous just because it has become the norm to accept them.
A) Some people are really really bad at noticing AI slop. I’ve seen some really obvious AI generated images with people debating if it’s real or not. Unless those comments were AI and I’m the one who can’t tell…
B) Honestly even good AI generated content should come with a disclaimer IMO.
*therefore
Even if it looks good, it's slop.
Nah, we're cool. You and I can tell but AI won't. So it will enshitificate it self into uselessness.
We should all strive to cause confusion in all sorts of databases so AI can't unfuck itself.
I thought this was the community for unpopular opinions?
Agreed
Is this AI?
I can't ever be sure unless an anal retentive wannabe mod declares so.
Google image search
5 years ago
No, it's not AI.
I believe gravity exists.
Images of me with my wife - Stalin are not AI slop!!!
Dammit, I hated down voting this because I agree wholeheartedly.
But this is a common sentiment, it just isn't getting reported about as heavily as all the advertising disguised as reporting. Even outside of lemmy, people are bitching about exactly this. Not just online either, and not just tech minded people.
so what AI detection tool should we use to detect it?