this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
83 points (92.8% liked)

Today I Learned

20887 readers
870 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

I like to use them when words create a unit of thought. Like line-of-sight, and such. It really helps readability. It prevents people from having to think too hard about certain sentences when it's ambiguous which words belong to what part of the sentence. Especially when the expression contains function words like "of".

However, I'm a fan of just making multiple words into compound words, like bumblebee. That doesn't work well with something like lineofsight, though.

As a side note, I wish we would being back the diaeresis in favor of hyphens in words like co-op. It used to be coöp, and that so much more fun. Or words like reëlect. Even when it's not abbreviated, the diaeresis makes it more obvious to readers how coöperative is pronounced. Or any other time where two vowels in a row are pronounced separately.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Albeit always confuses me. Albeït is so much better.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Da, comrade.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

trailblazers in space travel

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think you would be more convincing if you spelled "line of sight" correctly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Good catch. I fixed it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Would the dieresis be placed on top of the s in lineöfsight? Or would it be for vowels only?

Also, by your coöperative pronunciation example, people would be mispronouncing reëlect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Also, by your coöperative pronunciation example, people would be mispronouncing reëlect.

I'm not sure what you mean.

It's pronounced co-operative and re-elect. Coöp needs it to not sound lime "coop" as in chicken coop. Reëlect needs it to not sound like "reel" as in fishing reel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's vowels only, and that's funny. I hadn't thought about it for my hypothetical "lineofsite" word.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Good ol' #37.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 day ago

"Printed writing is very much design-led these days in adverts and Web sites, and people feel that hyphens mess up the look of a nice bit of typography," he said. "The hyphen is seen as messy looking and old-fashioned."

I see the dictionary editor they quoted is still fighting back.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm gonna argue with the title.

Obsolete means no longer of use, in a general sense.

Just because people don't know that the tool is there, or don't know how to apply it, doesn't mean it's obsolete. Hyphenation still has its original utility, it helps communicate in writing what is evident in speech.

I get what they mean, but the title is not accurate to the rest of the article, imo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Tell that to Word it always wants to auto contact my words to do that.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

You mis-spelled “to-day”.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Take a second to actually read this one. It's pretty short and sweet. It's also from 2007, and talks about nouns (maybe compound nouns) that we really don't think and probably never knew were hyphenated. It's not about the use we typically see today.

As an aside, I've noticed people start hyphenating in weird ways, like "I've been at this job for 7-years"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think at this point MS Word automatically recommends a hyphen after any number + quantifier combo. One time it wanted me to correct "three armed guards" to "three-armed guards" which would have changed the meaning considerably.

The number of times MS autocorrect suggests incorrect changes to grammar is laughably high, and most people just blindly follow the suggestions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I fucking hate autocorrect. I mean to say "its" a lot more often than I mean to say "it's", but Gboard on my phone tries to change it to the latter almost every time.

I say "almost" because it did it the first time in the above sentence, but not the second time, so it managed to make the wrong guess for both of them. Goddamn useless trash -- Markov can suck it!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Three-armed guards would probably be in very high demand, depending how functional the extra arm was

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Could the strange hyphenation be due to the influence of their mother tongue? I don't know if there is any language that does it like that, but it seems plausible.

[–] RandomVideos 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You should use replace the - with space or nothing at random

icecream ice cream ice-cream

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bīng Qí Lín Bing Chilling BingChilling Bing-Chilling

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah, just turn the first word into an adjective.

"Iced cream" sounds far more sophisticated than boring ice cream.

[–] RandomVideos 1 points 1 day ago

Or add - to words that don-t need-it

Iced-cream

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

there are times when punctuation is actually useful for clarification!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And capitals for readability.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

yeah, without them capitalizing that first t their comment is completely unreadable

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

hyphens are dead, capitalization is next.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

They can rip “E-mail” from my dusty old hands!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

they are a bit old-fashioned

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A question from a non-native speaker: Is there a definitve guide on American punctuation somewhere? I always wonder about American use of punctuation inside single quotes when quoting a term instead of a sentence, and some other cases where I see different intepretations of punctuation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

There are different ones for different kinds of writing (general, academic, journalism, and more). Chicago Manual of Style is one of the general ones. It's good, and considered authoritative, but you have to buy a copy or an online subscription.

A free one that I like is Purdue OWL (Online Writing Lab from a university). It's easy to understand and has good info.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The most commonly used tool for referencing English grammar that I know of is The Elements of Style by Strunk and White.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's good for some general writing tips, but S&W made plenty of their own errors in the book and had ambiguous or wrong explanations for various topics (IIRC they don't seem to know what passive voice actually is).

I wouldn't recommend it for someone looking for solid info about grammar itself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

That takes me back. That was the standard reference for my journalism degree 35 years ago. I still have it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've heard it being a bit snobbish and outdated, despite having newer editions, but I will look into it. Thanks for the tip.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Americans will often call any book snobbish and outdated, though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I found this. It seems pretty good. Although I don't really think it matters much. You'll likely be understood the same.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks. I think it is quite well made, and I would love authors read this before they hand in their manuscripts...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is old fashioned non-hyphenated?

like red tree

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

My experience is more "feels" than fact I suppose, but I've always seen it that any adjective or noun playing adverb to another adjective or participle should be hyphenated to the word it describes.

Red-hot coals (coals that are hot to the point of being red)

Red hot coals (coals that are both hot and red)

Ruby-red shoes (shoes that are as red as rubies)

Ruby red shoes (ruby shoes that are red)

Smooth-talking rogue (a rogue who talks smoothly)

Smooth talking rogue (a smooth rogue who talks)

Bamboo-eating panda (a panda who eats bamboo)

Bamboo eating panda (bamboo is eating a panda)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Special characters suck in on-screen keyboards, and the bastards rarely gave us physical thumboards.