this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
865 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

68567 readers
3956 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It garbles advertisers' data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can't work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know, just sounds like I'd be contributing to the marketers metrics so they can show "it works". it'll only make them invest in ads more. if anyone thinks capitalists are these genius level manipulators who know how everything works I only refer to the richest person alive being the least charismatic, least knowledgable, unfuckable troglodyte who keeps making an ass of himself.

if any of these companies suffer any losses or reduced profits they'll just fire hardworking people, not one of them will turn around and say maybe the ads aren't working when you actively work to show them that it is working.

[–] joshchandra@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

... until they keep having to dismiss people and go, "... huh." This is a marathon we're playing. You certainly don't have to use it, but I think the philosophy makes sense, especially given how AdNauseam doesn't click on acceptable ads that don't track you.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

they will never go "huh". you give way too much credit to corporate management.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 141 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Couple of issues I'm wondering about...

First, wouldn't clicking on everything just make you easier to track?

Second, how much bandwidth would all this use?

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 174 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (42 children)
  1. not in this way
  2. not enough to matter

the way it works is sending an HTTP request that registers as a "click" to the advertiser (thus costing them money), but then doesn't actually let the browser download any content and fetch the webpage, basically pi-holes the destination site and any attached tracking cookies. Combined with the fact that it does this to every ad, it would basically poison any click tracking.

edit: pedants

and before I get any more of you, this is just what I remember reading about adnauseam, do not take it as gospel, go look at AdNauseam's FAQ.

load more comments (42 replies)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I can't find an answer whether the "click" is behind some obfuscation, or if the "click every ad" is the obfuscation step itself by attempting to poison the data. The latter may work but yes, may actually increase tracking. Wish that answer wasn't so hard to find on their site.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Also wouldn't this be directing a ton of money to google? (or I guess any other ad provider)

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The advertisers are paying for the opportunity either way. Clicks cost them more money than just displaying the ad. Useless clicks cost them money for nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago

No, because it devalues their click through, as no sales will result from those clicks.

It's kinda like printing money, there's more of it, but the overall value hasn't increased.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] renzev@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know this is the good shit because when it first came out a few years back google was running a huge disinformation campaign against it. You'd search for "adnauseum" in google and the first result would be an article from some weird advertising company calling is "insecure" and "malware" without any actual argumentation behind those claims, while no other search engine returned that article (I lost the screenshots, so yall are just gonna have to take my word for it). They also delisted it from the chrome store for not discernible reason. They were afraid.

But nowadays I'm willing to bet that they figured out how to detect adnauseum's fake clicks and filtering it out. Stuff like that needs a talented development team to keep it up to date.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Has the same limitations as uBlock Origin with Manifest v3 and won't work in Chrome.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 160 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you're still using chrome at this point that's on you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago

The solution is simple. Chrome ditches manifest v2? Ditch Chrome.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 102 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I always liked using this on the premise of privacy-through-obfuscation. If the powers that be must get information from me, then i'd prefer to give them garbage information.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Exactly. You can't completely avoid being tracked but you can ensure that your profile is just noise without any value to advertisers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rimu@piefed.social 92 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Google has put a lot of effort into detecting and blocking stuff like this. They call it "click fraud", if you want to look it up.

It'll just mean they start ignoring clicks from you.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That, I guess, it’s the whole point. Stopping being tracked 🙂

[–] cageythree@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago

This feels like reverse psychology on a little kid.

"That's it, I'm not tracking you anymore! >:("
"Oooh nooo, what have I done! Oh how much I would wish to be tracked :("
"No, you won't convince me to change my mind >:("
"Oh well, guess I'll have to live without being tracked, what a shame that is."

[–] 0x0 45 points 1 week ago

They call it “click fraud”,

No, click fraud is using botnets to click ads in your site to increase your revenue.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

if enough people start doing it might be effective

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This would still make a connection to the ad servers that can then track me though.

I guess with a hardened browser and a VPN it would be alright.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 35 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Good start. Now make a version that clicks each ad a random number of times from randomly generated IP addresses.

[–] Tja 63 points 1 week ago (30 children)

That's not how IP addresses work.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What if we use a Visual Basic UI to hack the IP address by netmask?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments