this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
262 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

66783 readers
4634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House officials said the installation was an effort to increase internet availability at the complex. They said that some areas of the property could not get cell service and that the existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was overtaxed.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

In any healthy democracy, this would have been seen as a scandal exposing signs of corruption and would have likely resulted in the dissolution of the government and early election.

But the US is not a healthy democracy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

Not to worry, "some cited security concerns." We're all set

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago

Besides the security concerns, I want to know what they’re using it for, and how much bullshit they’re hiding by avoiding the official network.

It’s certainly not a speed and convenience thing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 hour ago

The corruption is clear, obvious, and blatant. Everyone knows about it, but there’s not a whole lot they can do. A good chunk of our citizens picked it on purpose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Given it's unrepresentative voting system I think how much is enough to be a democracy. T hot take for people that see democracy. Two parties to choose from is just one more than a clear dictatorship. If neither actually represents you then yeah it's not healthy .

[–] [email protected] 2 points 40 minutes ago

Agreed, except for one point. It's in oligarchy. Our "dictator" was just selling cars on the White House lawn. Capitalism won to get to it's late stages, happy to let racist hatred and russian influence fester for continued capital self-interest

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 seconds ago

They literally installed spyware in the WH. National security is an utter joke with these traitors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 seconds ago

So they routed all traffic in the WH through his sattelites, yay. Do I understand correctly that being an internet provider (and as WH can be singled out) means he can now know what resources everyone there access and force many proxy\VPN options shut? So he can get at least basic understanding if someone access matrix servers or whatever to leak data critical of DOGE, to block things he doesn't like (e.g. live streaming broadcast for select journalists) or just to get one more reason to fire everyone?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

Musk is literally a James Bond villain. Literally. Like LITERALLY a Bond villain.

Edit: minus the genius and charisma

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Anyone see the Johnny English with the American billionaire cyber-terrorist Jason Volta as the main antagonist?

That's how I see news coming from Washington developing on a daily basis.

We need you Rowan Atkinson.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

It would be a shame if some foreign actor could monitor Starlink internal networks.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

If you live in the DC area, absolutely do NOT sign up for this service.

100% chance that the government, as well as musks companies would be monitoring you directly 24/7.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I wholeheartedly agree.

However, it's hard to say that AT&T, Comcast, Cox and the like aren't all doing the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago

The way I see stuff like this is that you don't have to hand over your information on a silver platter directly to the agents.

Like when a trainload of east germans was allowed to migrate to the west through a separate country, they just had to hand their passports to the Stasi before being let go.

When the Stasi agents came to the train to collect the passports the east germans just threw them on the floor instead of handing them over, that is kinda how this should be viewed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

I'm gonna teach you a lesson on improv: "yes, and".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Run everything through a VPN tunnel instead?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 hour ago

Don't support fascists. Even if you have a VPN.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well now the Chinese and Russians just need to get a way into Shartlink and they can also monitor you and your government.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

they're already in, guaranteed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, we fired the cyber security people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Salt Typhoon is still ongoing, as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was “overtaxed” so they just threw up satellite instead of , I don’t know, improving the Wi-Fi infrastructure? There’s perfectly fine WiFi at sprawling work and college campuses, and stadiums that seat tens of thousands of people. What a joke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

Network infrastructure is a science and we don't need no damn science in this country!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

FFS, can we deal with these fucking traitors already?!?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 minutes ago

Well it looks like more people need to be screwed over, I guess maybe after it affects enough "Me's" it'll probably stay the same. The amount of damage that will be done before the American people stand up will be immense.

I honestly cannot believe that the average American is in agreement with this and that they think holding signs up will do anything. Sorry but they say violence is never the right course of action, but I think in this case you might need to see if that well regulated militia is ready to defend your freedom.

And shame on the Democratic party for just rolling over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

The only security this White House cares about is its own power and hiding (for the time being) its complete disregard for anything else.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 hours ago

President Musk making it feel more like home.
Add 13 children of ambiguous parentage he can ignore, and snug as a bug!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

"some areas of the property could not get cell service"

Like the bunkers? Like hell did the white house not have cell service.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I can believe areas of the White House have no cell service, on purpose. Remember when they found those fake cell towers around DC?

https://www.wired.com/story/dcs-stingray-dhs-surveillance/

I bet at some point they installed some cell phone jammers specifically to limit the amount of foreign spying that could be done by fake towers, and they simply "forgot" to tell the incoming Trump administration....

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 hours ago

probably more likely they fired the original IT team and replaced them with Muskite interns

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

Plenty of federal facilities have garbage reception. I think it's probably due to the bureaucracy involved in telecoms installing their hardware on sensitive property. The White House in particular probably has lots of thick walls/armor attenuating signals, too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

it's necessary so the Saudis can livestream all the blowjobs and asslickling happening in the oval office.