this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
157 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

8019 readers
301 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Before you call this stupid remember where Trump started.

When your goal is to sway the uninformed, you need only sway their hearts, not their minds.

This is a tried and true tactic.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadly, he's not stupid. He's evil and cynical, and callously manipulating those who are stupid.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

No, he actually is stupid, just not as much as his counterparts down south. The only legislation Pierre ever drafted Harper had to hire an army of consultants to walk him through it.

He's being dogwalked by people smarter than him though. Make no mistake, Stephen Harper still has massive control behind the party, especially the religious wing. Anyone paying attention to Alberta politics knows that Project 2025 is already in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

This isn't stupidity, it's intentional and calculating.

This bare-faced, obvious hypocrisy IS the point. It's right in our faces, and it forces his supporters to defend it. But it's the thin edge of the wedge...you defend this, and it shifts your tolerance window a bit, and the next one is a bit more egregious, and you defend that, then a bit more, and so on until you are defending felons and rapists who dismantle the government against your interests, because it supports your guy and hurts people you hate.

At the same time Poilievre's opponents become even more indignant and angry, and it further divides into two sides - the team, and the other. This is all intended to firm up the cult and further divide out the other.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Doesn't matter the language or location, every conservative accusation is a confession.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Whack the mole.

Shotgun the slogans.

Fiddle my faddle.

Verb the noun!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anti-tax candidates have powerful supporters: people with money.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Only because of tv and social media campaigns paid for with money.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Ah, the classic. Occuse your opponent of doing the thing you do so it looks like both sides are the same.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whenever I have a hard time believing x, y or z can be this stupid, I look at the United States. And then I believe it.

And this predates Trump by decades too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

"His entire leadership campaign" meaning literally the last three weeks? This is the opposite of a hot take, like, a Cold Give. That really doesn't work as a figure of speech, but I guess that makes it perfect for Pierre to steal and use himself.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stupid, or just cynical and evil?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I guess that depends on whether it works. God I hope it doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The messaging seems to be working, and if anything Canadians are illiterate

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Axe the tax, Build the homes, Project onto liberals...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago

Be glad. In my country the bar to run is so high that only 2 people make it to the debates.

Lowering the barrier of entry is good