this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
1022 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

63009 readers
3364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I find this very offensive, wait until my chatgpt hears about this! It will have a witty comeback for you just you watch!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago

Let me ask chatgpt what I think about this

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Also your ability to search information on the web. Most people I've seen got no idea how to use a damn browser or how to search effectively, ai is gonna fuck that ability completely

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

Gen Zs are TERRIBLE at searching things online in my experience. I’m a sweet spot millennial, born close to the middle in 1987. Man oh man watching the 22 year olds who work for me try to google things hurts my brain.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

To be fair, the web has become flooded with AI slop. Search engines have never been more useless. I've started using kagi and I'm trying to be more intentional about it but after a bit of searching it's often easier to just ask claude

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tinfoil hat me goes straight to: make the population dumber and they’re easier to manipulate.

It’s insane how people take LLM output as gospel. It’s a TOOL just like every other piece of technology.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mostly use it for wordy things like filing out review forms HR make us do and writing templates for messages to customers

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. It’s great for that, as long as you know what you want it to say and can verify it.

The issue is people who don’t critically think about the data they get from it, who I assume are the same type to forward Facebook memes as fact.

It’s a larger problem, where convenience takes priority over actually learning and understanding something yourself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As you mentioned tho, not really specific to LLMs at all

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it’s just escalating the issue due to its universal availability. It’s being used in lieu of Google by many people, who blindly trust whatever it spits out.

If it had a high technological floor of entry, it wouldn’t be as influential to the general public as it is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's such a double edged sword though, Google is a good example, I became a netizen at a very young age and learned how to properly search for information over time.

Unfortunately the vast majority of the population over the last two decades have not put in that effort, and it shows lol.

Fundamentally, I do not believe in arbitrarily deciding who can and can not have access to information though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I completely agree - I personally love that there’s so many Open Source AI tools out there.

The scary part is (similar to what we experienced with DeepSeek’s web interface) that its extremely easy for these corporations to manipulate, or censor information.

I should have clarified my concern - I believe we need to revisit critical thinking as a society (whole other topic) and especially so when it comes to tools like this.

Ensuring everyone using it, is aware of what it does, its flaws, how to process its output, and its potential for abuse. Similar to internet safety training for kids in the mid-2000s.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Counterpoint - if you must rely on AI, you have to constantly exercise your critical thinking skills to parse through all its bullshit, or AI will eventually Darwin your ass when it tells you that bleach and ammonia make a lemon cleanser to die for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is that it?

One of the things I like more about AI is that it explains to detail each command they output for you, granted, I am aware it can hallucinate, so if I have the slightest doubt about it I usually look in the web too (I use it a lot for Linux basic stuff and docker).

Some people would give a fuck about what it says and just copy & past unknowingly? Sure, that happened too in my teenage days when all the info was shared along many blogs and wikis...

As usual, it is not the AI tool who could fuck our critical thinking but ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I love how they chose the term "hallucinate" instead of saying it fails or screws up.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It’s going to remove all individuality and turn us into a homogeneous jelly-like society. We all think exactly the same since AI “smoothes out” the edges of extreme thinking.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Copilot told me you're wrong and that I can't play with you anymore.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Vs text books? What's the difference?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Just try using AI for a complicated mechanical repair. For instance draining the radiator fluid in your specific model of car, chances are googles AI model will throw in steps that are either wrong, or unnecessary. If you turn off your brain while using AI, you're likely to make mistakes that will go unnoticed until the thing you did is business necessary. AI should be a tool like a straight edge, it has it's purpose and it's up to you the operator to make sure you got the edges squared(so to speak).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I've only used it to write cover letters for me. I tried to also use it to write some code but it would just cycle through the same 5 wrong solutions it could think of, telling me "I've fixed the problem now"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (27 children)

I felt it happen realtime everytime, I still use it for questions but ik im about to not be able to think crtically for the rest of the day, its a last resort if I cant find any info online or any response from discords/forums

Its still useful for coding imo, I still have to think critically, it just fills some tedious stuff in.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Their reasoning seems valid - common sense says the less you do something the more your skill atrophies - but this study doesn't seem to have measured people's critical thinking skills. It measured how the subjects felt about their skills. People who feel like they're good at a job might not feel as adequate when their job changes to evaluating someone else's work. The study said the subjects felt that they used their analytical skills less when they had confidence in the AI. The same thing happens when you get a human assistant - as your confidence in their work grows you scrutinize it less. But that doesn't mean you yourself become less skillful. The title saying use of AI "kills" critical thinking skill isn't justified, and is very clickbaity IMO.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I use it to write code for me sometimes, saving me remembering the different syntax and syntactic sugar when I hop between languages. And I use to answer questions about things I wonder - it always provides references. So far it's been quite useful. And for all that people bitch and piss and cry giant crocodile tears while gnashing their teeth - I quite enjoy Apple AI. It's summaries have been amazing and even scarily accurate. No, it doesn't mean Siri's good now, but the rest of it's pretty amazing.

load more comments
view more: next ›