this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
260 points (97.4% liked)

Greentext

4979 readers
987 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Probably promoted to middle management instead

[–] [email protected] 3 points 44 minutes ago

He might be overqualified

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

run it in a vm

[–] [email protected] 95 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (6 children)

https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-illiterate-programmers

Relevant quote

Every time we let AI solve a problem we could’ve solved ourselves, we’re trading long-term understanding for short-term productivity. We’re optimizing for today’s commit at the cost of tomorrow’s ability.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

I like the sentiment of the article; however this quote really rubs me the wrong way:

I’m not suggesting we abandon AI tools—that ship has sailed.

Why would that ship have sailed? No one is forcing you to use an LLM. If, as the article supposes, using an LLM is detrimental, and it's possible to start having days where you don't use an LLM, then what's stopping you from increasing the frequency of those days until you're not using an LLM at all?

I personally don't interact with any LLMs, neither at work or at home, and I don't have any issue getting work done. Yeah there was a decently long ramp-up period — maybe about 6 months — when I started on ny current project at work where it was more learning than doing; but now I feel like I know the codebase well enough to approach any problem I come up against. I've even debugged USB driver stuff, and, while it took a lot of research and reading USB specs, I was able to figure it out without any input from an LLM.

Maybe it's just because I've never bought into the hype; I just don't see how people have such a high respect for LLMs. I'm of the opinion that using an LLM has potential only as a truly last resort — and even then will likely not be useful.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Not even. Every time someone lets AI run wild on a problem, they're trading all trust I ever had in them for complete garbage that they're not even personally invested enough in to defend it when I criticize their absolute shit code. Don't submit it for review if you haven't reviewed it yourself, Darren.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Nahhh, I never would have solved that problem myself, I'd have just googled the shit out of it til I found someone else that had solved it themselves

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

This guy's solution to becoming crappier over time is "I'll drink every day, but abstain one day a week".

I'm not convinced that "that ship has sailed" as he puts it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

Hey that sounds exactly like what the last company I worked at did for every single project 🙃

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Capitalism is inherently short-sighted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Java is literally easy bro tf is there to stress about...

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

I don't think you can memorize how code works enough to explain it and not learn codding.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 42 minutes ago

You'd think that, but I believe you are underestimating people's ability to mindlessly memorize stuff without learning it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It's super easy to learn how algorithms and what not work without knowing the syntax of a language. I can tell you how a binary search tree works, but I have no clue how to code it in Java because I've never used Java.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

And similarly, i could read code in a language I dont know, understand what it does and how it works even if I don't know the syntax well enough to write it myself

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

I mean same, but you can look to the official docs for like what a loop or queue looks like

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a full stack polyglot and tbh I couldn't program in some languages without reference docs / LLM even though I ship production code in those language all the time. Memorizing all of the function and method names and all of the syntax/design pattern stuff is pretty hard especially when it's not really needed in contemporary dev.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

Yeah a doctor has to read up on a disease in a book when they encounter it. Completely normal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Exactly my thought

[–] [email protected] 56 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

Why would you sign up to college to willfully learn nothing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

A lot of kids fresh out of highschool are pressured into going to college right away. Its the societal norm for some fucking reason.

Give these kids a break and let them go when they're really ready. Personally I sat around for a year and a half before I felt like "fuck, this is boring lets go learn something now". If i had gone to college straight from highschool I would've flunked out and just wasted all that money for nothing.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

My Java classes at uni:

Here's a piece of code that does nothing. Make it do nothing, but in compliance with this design pattern.

When I say it did nothing, I mean it had literally empty function bodies.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 hours ago

Yeah that's object oriented programming and interfaces. It's a shit to teach people without a practical example but it's a completely passable way to do OOP in industry, you start by writing interfaces to structure your program and fill in the implementation later.

Now, is it a good practice? Probably not, imo software design is impossible to get right without iteration, but people still use this method... good to understand why it sucks

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

So what? You also learn math with exercises that 'do nothing'. If it bothers you so much add some print statements to the function bodies.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A diploma ain't gonna give you shit on its own

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

So does breathing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

To get a job so you don't starve

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because college is awesome and many employers use a degree as a simple filter any way

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Not a single person I've worked with in software has gotten a job with just a diploma/degree since like the early 2000s

Maybe it's different in some places.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Many HR departments will automatically kick out an application if it doesn't have a degree. It's an easy filter even if it isn't the most accurate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah fair point, but then how are you going to get the job if you're completely incompetent at programming 🤔

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Just use AI bro

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We are saying the same thing. Degree > diploma for jobs. Go to college, get degree

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I meant any form of qualification. Sure it helps, but the way you get the job is by showing you can actually do the work. Like a folio and personal projects or past history.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Art? Most programming? "Hard skills" / technical jobs... GOOD jobs. Sure. But there's plenty of degrees & jobs out there. Sounds like you landed where you were meant to be, alot of folks go where opportunity and the market takes them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Its probably a regional difference. Here in AU, you can be lucky and land a few post grad jobs if you really stood out. Otherwise you're entirely reliant on having a good folio and most importantly connections.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

He should be grateful. I hear programming interviews are pretty similar, as in the employer provides the code, and will pretty much watch you work it in some cases. Rather be embarrassed now than interview time. I'm honestly impressed he went the entire time memorizing the code enough to be able to explain it, and picked up nada.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

He probably couldn't explain it well if he didn't know how to code at all imo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

I'm honestly impressed he went the entire time memorizing the code enough to be able to explain it, and picked up nada.

Or he asked the LLM to summarise it and memorised that.

[–] GarlicToast 8 points 4 hours ago

Been a TA when chatGPT was released. Most students shot their own foot this way before we figured what was happening. Grades went from bell shaped to U shaped. A few students got 85+, the rest failed, it was brutal. Thought I failed my students horribly before I found out it was happening in all classes.

If you actually stuck in such a situation, solve as many problems as you can. An approach that will work for most people:

  1. Try to solve
  2. Fail
  3. Take a peek, understand your failure. If the peek didn't include full solution, go back to step 1. Else continue to step 4.
  4. Move to the next question and go back to step 1.

Make sure to skip questions if they are too easy. Evey 4~ hours take a 20 minutes nap (not longer than 25 minutes). If you actually manage to solve enough problems to pass, go to sleep, 4.5 hours or a longer multiplier of 1.5 hours.

After the exam go back and solve all homework yourself. DO NOT cram it, spread it or you will retain nothing long term.

Good luck.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago

Now imagine how it'll feel in interviews

[–] [email protected] 91 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

If it's the first course where they use Java, then one could easily learn it in 21 hours, with time for a full night's sleep. Unless there's no code completion and you have to write imports by hand. Then, you're fucked.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

My first programming course (in Java) had a pen and paper exam. Minus points if you missed a bracket. :/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

Haha same. God that was such a shit show. My hand writing is terrible lmao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

I got -30% for not writing comments for my pen and paper java final.

Somehow it just felt a bit silly to do, I guess

[–] [email protected] 100 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

If there's no code completion, I can tell you even people who's been doing coding as a job for years aren't going to write it correctly from memory. Because we're not being paid to memorize this shit, we're being paid to solve problems optimally.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 hours ago

Also get paid extra to not use java

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›