this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025

86 points (95.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12779 readers

885 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

TikTok ban cited in suspected arson of Rep. Glenn Grothman's office (www.fdlreporter.com)

submitted 19 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

FOND DU LAC – A 19-year-old man accused of setting fire to a building in Fond du Lac early Sunday that included Republican U.S. Rep. Glenn Grothman's office cited the TikTok ban as a motive in the incident, according to authorities.

The Fond du Lac Police Department said the Menasha man was arrested after being found near a strip mall, 525 N. Peters Ave., that contained Grothman's district office.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] alphapuggle 13 points 17 hours ago

Be gay do crime

Legislators should be afraid of the people

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Glenn Grothman.

[+] [email protected] -7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Don't torch his office over it though

[–] [email protected] 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There's many other reasons to torch his office. You should check out what his congressional district looked like.

[+] [email protected] -11 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

That's not a reason to commit arson. You shouldn't go around burning things and causing destruction.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, you do if you want to force change, punish more than a single person, want to disrupt activities, or want to make as big a scene as possible to gain visibility.

Violent protest may not be popular, but it can work.

The real problem here is that the moron doing it did it poorly, with little or no real planning, and ran the risk of unnecessary collateral damage. You gotta be careful with fire, and this wasn't careful

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Really? You’re actually advocating arson as a potentially safe and effective way to effect social change?

Grow the fuck up. I’m so glad you people lost political power this cycle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

You people?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Apologies that leftists aren't too much of cowards to hide behind talking heads promoting stochastic terrorism. I mean it's not like leftists lying about what operations are being performed at hospitals led to bomb threats being called in or riling people up calling for trial by combat and needing to fight like he'll moments before people violently entered the capitol building. Or constantly threaten to run over protesters, and many times actually do.

I could spend more time looking up and pointing out all the right wing violence, but asymmetric bullshit principle and all that. Fuck off, progressive and left leaning people are tired of the double standard when it comes to political violence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

So you just gonna ignore all the times republican congressman and voters pushed for violence and actually committed it?

Talk about needing to grow the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You're only not a slave due to people going around burning things and causing destruction.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 hours ago

Interestingly, people are only ever slaves as a result of that same process

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The vote was overwhelmingly in favor of the ban, dude, on both sides of the aisle, and every other House member in Wisconsin voted in favor of it. Your one legislator is not the deciding factor on this.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It was inserted into a bill for foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel. That's what had bipartisan support.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

More reasons not to vote for it. Quite the flex to say 'I had to vote for it, because it was in the must-pass genocide bill!'.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

Hardly. It even had a unanimous supreme court decision to uphold the ban. The ban had bipartisan support up until what's his name started jerking everyone around.

Legally, this is all well-covered ground with the Grindr divest or ban law that was wrapped up the week before COVID lockdowns started. So most people forgot about it.

Because there's money involved, 47 wants to spin everyone around in hopes of ByteDance changing their mind and selling to one of his tech bro campaign funders so that big financial benefits from knowing the president can stay in day 1.