this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
73 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5629 readers
302 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

As a casual self hoster with Gitea running exclusively to clone GitHub repos for archival purposes. Think Nintendo gaming adjacent and risking DMCA. Is there any reason for me to switch to forgejo while I have the chance?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Forgejo is way more promising as far as I can tell. Gitea is way less community oriented

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My question would be, if you're only archiving repos, why do you need a forge?
A simple git clone <repo> to any your archival directory would be enough to store them, there's no need for you to use a forge software.

Are there any other features of gitea you use?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I like having the codebase in an easily presentable way. Git clone with a cron job would work fine but doesn’t tickle my fancy enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

If you mean a (read-only) web interface, there's also cgit and gitweb.

I mean, it's your party and if Gitea works for you, that's great. It still is a bigger piece of software than what you need (or at least what you've told so far), it's up to you to determine if you're fine with that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

As I understand it, forgejo came about when someone maneuvered to consolidate control of gitea. So I guess if you stay you may eventually become subject to various anti-user practices that non-open software tend to gravitate toward

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

They formed an llc to help get funding for the project and to hire maintainers and the like. They’ve also contracted with some other companies to add support for things like the security tab (from gh), azure support, etc that are currently only available on “enterprise” gitea because of contract reasons. Last I heard the goal was to get those contributed to the main oss gitea but it’s a bit of work to get done because lawyers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Not that I can see, they have fewer releases while also having 3 different branches (7, 9, and now 10) and overall have about half the contributions of gitea over the past month