this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44332 readers
688 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So dumb.

Hour argument, that the final cliff fall scene in Predator 1 was two different jumps in the 2 cuts.

Can see in the first one he is rotating. Second cut is a straight plumb drop into the water.

How were the rotational moments counteracted?

They weren't, it's two different jumps/takes.

2 friends came up with some hair-brained arguments that you could stop rotating on the way down. (๋ˆˆ_๋ˆˆ)

The only way would be air resistance, and hands/arms is not going to be enough to create drag to counter the rotation.

[โ€“] JackbyDev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate when people get into minute arguments about what is visually happening on screen versus the story that's being told. It can be a single jump narratively but two jumps in production. (I've never seen the movie.)

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I was not invested in the outcome of the argument, just seeing how far they were willing to take being wrong about aerodynamics/physics. Quite far it turns out.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Jackie Chan: Always shoot the punch twice.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Kinda related, I studied in Spain for a semester. Was taking with my fellow American roommate about the debate of if a tomato is a fruit or vegetable. Our host mom's daughter's boyfriend (Cuban, fwiw) overheard, and we told him about the "controversy" in the US but all 3 of us agreed it was a fruit. Host mom overheard us and asked what we were talking about, and the Cuban told her. "Well yeah, of course it's a vegetable"

I couldn't understand every word but when I could tell they were arguing about some vegetables having seeds or something like that I knew I spread something.

load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Someone on Bluesky last night mentioned Woody Allen for some offhand reason, and some sock puppet account was loudly defending Woody and saying he never did anything wrong and that Soon-Yin was never parented by him or anything like that. Imagine being a shill for Woody Allen of all people.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So someone chimed in on a subject that was never broached in the first place? It reminds me of the people on reddit who will always pipe in about how mean John Lennon was no matter what the subject about him is.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Literally someone joked "don't Woody Allen me" and this account went off with a bunch of "facts". It was super odd.

When I was on Reddit I was talking about Jian Ghomeshi's sexual abuse charges on r/Canada (before it got overrun by racists), and a sock puppet account sent me the weirdest PM, about how I wanted to "touch the diamond that is Jian's life, but holding a melting diamond in your hands is dangerous" or some such shit. I actually feel it was Jian Ghomeshi because it was so narcissistic and weird. I could of course be wrong, but I really think it was. The wording was just too weird.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ