this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1135 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

7034 readers
221 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 138 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That train will just keep coming. Once such a freight train is going you better get out of the way. The amount of kinetic energy that's coming towards you is dwarfing compared to a measly tank.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

A train of 8000 tons at a velocity of 30 km/h roughly has the kinetic energy of 66.39 kg TNT.

Supposedly 100 kg TNT

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

~~I don't think your units make sense


kinetic energy has units of energy, but "kg TNT per second" is power (about 4MW). (I think just remove the "every second" and it's correct?)~~

Edit: parent edited comment.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 115 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

this sub doesn't exist on Lemmy :(
i miss r/bitchimatrain

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like it's time to create it!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see in the world! Don’t let your dreams be dreams!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but if you're gonna create it, you have to post to it like once a week or it'll just sit there dead, forever.

And who wants to find something to post once a week? Can't I just have Facebook feed it to me. Picture Zuck saying "here comes the plane!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Sorry for Reddit watermark… couldn’t quickly find it elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

that is literally the worst watermark I've ever seen in my entire time on the internet, more than a quarter century now.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is there a Reddit watermark at all!? They didn't create the content, and I doubt Mr. Watterson would want it to be hosted there. Did a redditor go out of their way to slap that over the last panel? Like you said, the absolute worst...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I made this.jpg

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For your consideration, the Calvin and Hobbes Search Engine: https://michaelyingling.com/random/calvin_and_hobbes/

Edit to show example search for “freight train”: https://michaelyingling.com/random/calvin_and_hobbes/search.php?phrase=freight+train

I didn’t make this site, I just find it to be very useful for this extremely niche use case 🤣 Although, weirdly, it seems to be linking the wrong strip for this particular one. Dunno why, I’ve never seen it do that before.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Here you go.

South Carolina in September. Low-slung trailer got stuck at the crossing and the driver skedaddled right before the impact. Also, ever so sadly, it doesn't officially count as a tank, only self-propelled artillery.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I expected more damage on the train. It really didn't give a fuck.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think less and less damage to either side as armor and structural integrity increase is probably the norm with trains. For example non armor vehicles are turned into fun metal tangles. This 30 ton "lightly" armored vehicle looks pretty intact. A 70 ton tank might just remain more intact as the train shunts it to the side. The train might take more superstructure damage but there's a lot of just solid metal pushing in one direction. So I don't think any impact like that is ever going to actually just destroy the train.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

The armor is light, the vehicle isn't.

On the other hand, a pair of locomotives can easily be over 400 tons, and that's not counting the rest of the train. Those doublestacked shipping containers on a well car can add 100 tons each.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was wondering how a tank ended up on a railway track.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

It was training for battle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Kinda looks like an M1A1 Abrams to me

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

That is 100 percent a pally. Abrams don't have rear doors.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, it's got that extra flat butt and long overhang with the basket thing on the back of the turret. The news report also said it's a Paladin, though this video is also showing off midsize-market local American news, so I wouldn't have trusted it on its own.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Why don't we use trains on battlefields? (I see no issues with this plan)

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You could even wrap the tracks around the train so it can go wherever it wants!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's just a tank with extra steps

[–] el_abuelo 14 points 2 weeks ago

No there are no steps. And even if there were the wraparound tracks would be able to go up them due to their circular nature.

[–] anzo 13 points 2 weeks ago

Make a lengthier tank? Like a centipede!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cereal is actually a kind of soup.

And tanks are technically a type of train.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

A small train that carries its tracks with it wherever it goes?

A better question is whether a self-propelled artillery "train" is a tank.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Russia and Ukraine do

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Considering tanks are transported by train, not surprising. Train big.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the train I am currently on was transported by truck.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

This is for sure gta

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well that's an M109 Paladin. It weighs about half as much as an actual tank. But if it was fully loaded there's a pretty good chance nobody wins because it's an artillery system and it carries a lot of stuff that goes boom.

I don't care to speculate on who wins between a 70 ton tank and a train. It probably depends on what the train is pulling.

Edit to add - also we need pictures from different angles. From this angle it looks like the Paladin might have simply been de-tracked. But I'm pretty sure there's more damage as it's armor is actually comparatively light, rated for small arms and shrapnel.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So it's more self-propelled artillery?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Technically yeah, colloquially no sane person would judge another for calling such a thing a tank

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's only a tank if it comes from the Tankeshire region of England, otherwise it's just sparkling armoured vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

That's exactly what it is.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

🇺🇸This is America🇺🇸

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Attention dispatch... There has been a mass shooting at the site of the Tank Train collision, but thankfully all victims have successfully had their medical claims for woundcare denied. Time to go home...

Top Gun theme blares as the Police Mustang drives off into the sunset. And... scene.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Worthy of a South Park bit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't that a self-propelled artillery piece? I wanna say like an M109 or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

tank looks like missing parts of the bottom part, train is uhh 🥭

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Just skirts and detracted, the hull is probably intact but likely cracked enough it will need refurb at the factory. Also it probably fell off the train rather than ran into it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

It looks like the tank returned fire.

load more comments
view more: next ›