this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)

Alberta

682 readers
140 users here now

Provincial Localities

Other Provincial Communities:

Links:

Images:

- Flag (banner) and Shield (icon)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m a researcher. to my knowledge pji is a type of law firm or legal fund, unconfirmed.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

The name is blacked out so I'm going to assume it's a UCP MLA.

Looking forward to the trump tariffs forcing people to reckon with how our government is incompetent as fuck. Maybe then people will be able to see through the facade of fake economic populism to the demonic ghoulishness at the core of this party's policies.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"Sport gender checks for minors"??

Is this exactly what it sounds like?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Pro Tip: MAP means minor attracted person or to be clear a pedophile.... MAPS are PEDOPHILES... If Alberta is becoming a welcoming place to pedophiles then perhaps we should collectively shun Alberta....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ohhhhhh ok.

So this is satire then, right?

As in it’s pointing out the hypocrisy in UCP policies that claim to protect children, but are actually harmful to them?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 hours ago

... Shunning is your strategy of choice?

[–] ICastFist 16 points 8 hours ago

Please tell me this is some sort of satire/irony intended to wake up the people of Alberta

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

oh no oh no oh no no no nooooooooooooo no no please no

[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It could be satire, might not be. TBH, If Alberta is doing all of this, then yes, they're actively making it easier and more likely that children will be abused. Opt-in sex education is one that's especially pernicious; that's one of the things that give children the knowledge that what is happening to them is abusive. Without that, they may think that it's 'normal', that it happens to everyone. Teaching children correct anatomic names removes the ability of child abusers to use coded language.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Yes this is all happening. We have an election coming up too and it's looking like it might be what a majority of albertans want.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 hours ago

a bunch of assholes trying to equate LGBT people to pedos.

false flag operation, or actual pedos? both.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's "minor attracted person". So pedophiles who went all out on: its not me that's the problem, but society...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I believe the original purpose of that phrase, was to differentiate between people who act on those attractions, and those who understand it's wrong and refrain from doing so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is using the same kind of language as like "Person of Color", as if pedophilia is an identity rather than an illness.

If we truly want a neutral clinical name, we'd say something like "Minor Attraction Disorder". It's something that's only permissible if you are actively seeking help and self control like any other disorder that's prone to harm.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago

You're conflating pedophilia with MAP, which is the very thing they're trying to combat.

The difference between MAD and MAP would be if you're referring to the person or the condition, obviously. And I'm sure you can see why nobody wants to be referred to as a MAD person.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

They wouldn't do well in prison, Mister Geek.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What does removing child capacity mean?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

Capacity to consent if I understand correctly

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

In certain circles, people asking for this are fishing for a doc willing to perform a lobotomy on a child

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds like something that doesn’t happen. What would be the purpose of that? Do you have any more information?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

It was good enough for the Kennedy's

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck? So they want less child rights?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

No, they want less child brain...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Since this is blacked out can you confirm this is not a parody group intending to make a point? The pedophiles are actually this delusional and blatant (look up Prostasia) but need to check.