this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
544 points (96.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1884 readers
810 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

Wtf? Why am I benefiting most under Harris? Shouldn't the be the guys on the very bottom?

I mean, I'll take it, but...weird?

(also fuck Trump, he can eat dirty diapers)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I thought the top 0.1% was more like $3 million. Either way it's still an incredibly large amount of money for 1 in 1000 people to be making. With 131 million households that's 131000 households making more than $14 million per year which is WILD. One in a thousand isn't that uncommon, yet I'd never guess who were making that kind of money. They must just be living in completely separate spaces.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think nearly 10% of the US population is millionaires (by wealth, not income) and the percentage is even more if you take home equity into account.

Say what you will about the country, but there isn't a prosperity problem, only a rampant inequality problem.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Millionare in assets is vastly different than $1 million per year in income. It's pretty much a requirement to have $1 million in assets to be able to retire lately and assuming years of compounding growth in the market this is pretty easily attainable by retirement for most (I know this is a big assumption but our whole economy is built on it).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

"Millionaire in assets" is even less impressive when you factor in someone's home value. Like, Zillow keeps telling me my condo is worth $350k. I guess I am worth that on paper, but it's not liquid or "walking around" money.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

MAGA voters be like: Red scary, ugh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Honestly they're hoping you only look at the bottom big numbers and ignore your actual insurance bracket.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Still wants to turn the country red.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Now imagine inflation and the weakening dollar under trumps plan

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

It's the tariffs I'm worried about.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The ones that make 14 million or more would have AT LEAST $544,135 to waste on Trump propaganda (comes from 376,910 + 167,225)

[–] Tja 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Times so much more :P

[–] [email protected] 51 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago

The heritage foundation has a plan. Why come up with your own when someone has already done the work for you?

[–] [email protected] 62 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] derpgon 2 points 7 hours ago

It is a good plan, maybe the best plan that was ever planned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I might break 140k this year living near Seattle for a single income household with 3 children under 6. Is this graph saying that Trump's tax plan will benifit me, a middle class, some would argue lower middle class in this location, better than Harris?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

I haven't looked into the specifics of these policies, so I could be wrong, but I'd say no.

This graph doesn't really take into account everything it should IMO. The massive tax cuts to the wealthy are going to dramatically screw over people with lower incomes, because there'll be less money overall. I believe Trump's case would involve making up that deficit with really high tariffs on things, especially Chinese goods. This means that, although your taxes would be slightly lower on paper, you're spending a lot more money for literally everything that's made in China (or contains parts or materials from China). Typically tax cuts for the wealthy also involve money leaving crucial areas for lower income areas, like schools and infrastructure. The Harris plan (I believe) is revenue neutral, meaning for you it's literally free money with no downsides. In her case the extra money comes from slightly increasing the tax rates of the wealthy (as you can see here).

It's also worth noting that your income is taxes in the brackets it falls in. The first $39,000 is taxed at that (lower) rate, then the next bit is taxed in the next bracket, etc. Breaking the $140,000 mark doesnt mean all your income is now taxed at a higher rate. I THINK this is taken into account in this graph, but I haven't looked into it to be sure. I wanted to mention it though because it's a constant point of confusion for people.

Hope this helps.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yes the graph says that your income would be around 0.7% higher. What the dramatic increase of the others will do to the value of your income (inflation) and hence the stuff you can actually effort with this, is up to discussion of somebody who knows this stuff better than me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not voting for Trump for a thousand dollars on my tax return. Seeing by the down votes people really think any kind of scrutiny shouldn't be discussed, and no one wants to talk about a family man and his income. This fight between getting income relief for the bottom class and letting millionaires run free leaves the middle class more or less get pulled.

My income is fine with me, I make enough to survive even with the high prices of groceries. I'm looking for a better life for my family. Something I have many options for, where millions are struggling to put food on the table. So I know where my heart is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It only goes so if Trump doesn't place the tariffs he says he wants to place, because then prices on all goods increase across the board...

He wants 100% tarrifs which is just a tax on us in the end on everything from China and Mexico. And 20% on everywhere else.

So every item you buy, mark the price up by such, and then ask yourself if you spend $1000 that year.

Note: never has he mentioned food being exempt.

Throw in the deportations and you look at the building unions who say they are 400,000 workers short, and you realize labor shortages will increase building costs which in turn drive up insurance costs for houses...

So your income will go up by a $1000, and your expenses will go up dramatically

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

He wants 100% tarrifs which is just a tax on us in the end on everything from China and Mexico. And 20% on everywhere else.

I legitimately think he doesn't understand that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

To be fair if someone worded it to him like I worded it there, it isn't very clear. I really need to take more time to phrase sentences more clearly. (Off topic but just needed to criticize myself there)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The issue here is that for those of us who are actually in the middle class a thousand bucks shouldn’t make us betray folks who need the help more than us.

IMO

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I agree. I came from poverty. I know what it's like there. And voting against poverty stricken Americans for a little more on my plate is evil. But I'm not going to lie when I'm being stretched thin too. I climbed hard with my labor and some days I feel like the line between middle class and lower class is right on my heels. I can't help but feel angry that there's nothing being done.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago

Raising minimum wage does not cause inflation.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I assume this isn't including some of the other things in Trump's proposals like getting rid of tax credits for having a child.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Also, what he already did. The home office tax credit was dropped for W2 employees as part of his plan. Wasn't really noticed at the time, but circumstances later on meant that a lot of people could have been taking that credit if someone else was President. Amounts to a few hundred a year--not huge, but not nothing.

IIRC, it automatically goes back to the way it was in a few more years assuming nothing else changes.

load more comments
view more: next ›