this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58997 readers
4260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 week ago

They had one?

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 week ago

TIL Netflix had a game studio.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago

First I've heard of it.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The first time I heard about it, was when it opened. The second time I'm hearing about it, is when it closed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That's one better than me then.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago

And nothing of value was lost.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They had a AAA gaming studio? I must have been living under a rock.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Same rock here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sure you didn't know that you can play games in Netflix either :p

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

You can play games on YouTube apparently as well now.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It should have been a AAAAA studio. That is where they fucked up.

Or, they fucked up thinking that people wanting to watch movies wanted to play games....

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wasn't it all mobile games? I'm pretty sure that was the exact market they were looking for. People with short attention spans that can't put down the phone, even while consuming other media.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just ignored all the ads and any news, so you are likely correct. I did think that most of the games were mobile, but I must have been mistaken in thinking it was playable on Netflix clients on your TV or something.

I used to play Pac-Man on my old FireTV with the controller while I was killing time in the mornings before work, so I thought it was similar in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Damn, I didn't know that was a thing either, lol. I'd play retro games on the TV remote.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Based on the article: the AAA thing was supposed to be something new/different, but they closed it before releasing anything. I also haven’t tried the mobile games, but they should be still available, that is done by a different team

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, ok. I definitely didn't read it in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Or, they fucked up thinking that people wanting to watch movies wanted to play games....

true gamers dont watch movies 😡😡😡😡🤬🤬

og movie freaks dont play vidya 🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

For those saying they didn't know about this, it's because they never actually released anything. They got shut down unexpectedly before they finished any projects. Allegedly there are still some in-development games based on Netflix properties that will still be released on their gaming service, and the service itself will stay up. It's just the studio itself that was shut down.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

It wasn't a terrible idea, but I'm not surprised that it failed

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well, they produced Oxenfree 2 which was a welcome sequel that I enjoyed. But other than that, I didn't really hear about anything else from them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was it a AAA game? How can it be this unknown when it was AAA?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Not really AAA at all, no.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Was that this studio, or their other studio that's been running since 2017? This one, "Team Blue," was supposed to be working on some unannounced AAA game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Oxenfree 2 is out? I need to take a look. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what does the speedometer do in oxenfree 2? just curious

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know. In ancient times, they had radios with tuners - and scales for visual feedback. ;)

In the game, they use it as a plot device for the communication with other... planes of reality? I liked the idea in part 1.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope Halo can use this opportunity to invite Joe Staten back on board. Their Creative Director opening on LinkedIn was closed recently, but who they actually hired we don't know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If any of the current developers played any of the old games it would be an improvement. What on Earth were they doing with that open world thing, it was so boring, if it had a story it got completely lost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You know, looking at reports, I definitely think that it was an idea that was executed badly for reasons that were not just because of the open world concept. Maybe if they had developed a better engine that offloaded the tech debt they had for so long, or if their hiring practices weren't on 18 month contracts, or if they had a better vision in the game direction, etc., the game wouldn't have ended up in this place, and the open world might have worked out, and they didn't have to cut so much from the game. But asking what ifs is no use, the game in the end still left much to be desired.

I share the same opinion as you, that the story in Infinite did not really satisfy me. But it still got some positive responses to it and some people liked it, and I'm happy for them. The open world concept in Infinite is inspired by the semi open world map in Halo 1 like Arriving on Halo, art direction is inspired by Bungie Halo but much more polished, and lots of story pieces are referenced from old Halo games or extended universe materials. So saying that the devs did not do their homework is kinda unfair, imo. For that, the Halo TV show by Paramount takes the crown of disregarding original materials (or even the basic concept, even).

There's a pretty good video essay on YT that goes more in depth into what 343 did right for Infinite's story, I'll link it here. Although 1 hour long, I highly recommend giving it a watch. His Halo 4 retrospective video is pretty good too.

I definitely still prefer a concentrated and linear story line, though. Like watching a movie or a TV show, I want to be on the ride that the game designers intended. Not saying that open world games can't deliver the same experience, but linear games have the advantage of having more control of the story beats in the game. I guess we'll see what the new leadership would bring.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If only this meant the removal of the annoying tiles for games that show up in the app above everything else (often using up the entire screen) even though I've never tapped on them once.

I don't want your games Netflix. I barely want your shows.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They why are you using it?

P.S.: the duplicated comments were a Jerboa bug, with a connection problem.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Darn. They made that choose your own adventure thing on Netflix right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I remember doing the bear grills one, and one of the choices was to jump over a ravine, or walk over it using a fallen tree as a bridge.

Being the hiker I am, the obvious choice of walk around it being missing kind of annoyed me, but I chose the tree option.

Bear died.

So I got to go back and pick the jump over option, which was apparently the right one.

Who the fuck does running jumps over a 15 foot deep ravine.

I never bothered with the choose your own adventure things again. When the correct choice is just not available and the next logical choice just means an instant loss, you don’t have a very fun game

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I've had a lot of fun with the content they added for Into the Breach.