this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
1153 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

10394 readers
3279 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

This is a square in polar coordinates

[–] [email protected] 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A square? A square?! Wake up sheeple! That things not even a rombus! Don't you see the lies? Look at the lines! Look! Not all rhombuses are squares, but all squares are rhombuses! All squares are rhombuses and look at this thing they try to call a square. Where are the parallel lines? There's got to be parallel lines, don't you see, or then it's not a rombus and all squares are rhombuses. Don't forget that, don't let them take that fact from you and perpetuate their geometric lies. Does no one even remember what a rombus is? This is, this is basic geometry here that you should have learned in middle school or elementary school, but then you just forget it, and let people trick you with these misleading definitions and fancy diagrams but you have to remember that a Square. Is. A. Rombus.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And all rhombus are parallelograms. By definition opposing sides must be parallel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

YES. YES! A square is a rombus is a parallelogram! You see it too! There are no parallels in this diagram, only lies and trickery!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 15 hours ago

This has an infinite number of sides

[–] [email protected] 22 points 16 hours ago

270°≠90°

You could say a regular square has 4 270° exterior angles

[–] [email protected] 30 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is what AI would give you after countless tries strating with a triangle and having gone up the Pentagon and down to two pairs of unconnected parallel lines.....but what if all equally sized lines were connected? Bam! This

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Fun Fact: It is very difficult to get any of the image generators to make a pentagon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I thought this couldn't be true, so using one of the newer models (4bit flux) I told it to make a 5 sided star, and then put lines around the outside

lol this is very weird, did they forbid it from looking at pentagons in the training data or something? it can't do The Pentagon either, it gives it 8-12 sides instead

[–] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Man I miss my Zune 80

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (6 children)

A square has all right angles inside the structure. This thing has two inside and two outside.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

Kinda forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Those arc sides are parallel in polar coordinates.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago

You don't normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 201 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you miss one important constraint in your CAD project.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago

Oh man I felt this.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 21 hours ago

Take that, Euclid!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Now make a square out of squiggly yarn

String theorists claim this is the true shape of spacetime!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

It's Pac-Man with a megaphone!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Pac-man eating a new york slice

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

you geometry people go too far stop personifying vertexes, planes, and points math shouldn't be fun

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 148 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Wouldn't the angles need to be interior?

[–] [email protected] 176 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They are all interior to the meme

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago

This is merely a projection of a square on the surface of a cone projected onto a plane.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

Where are the broad, flat fingernals tho?

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago

Easy there Diogenes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

It makes me want to be angry and laugh at the same time

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›