this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
1164 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

10394 readers
4789 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

also the sides must be straight

[–] [email protected] 177 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's 2024 now... Not everyone has to be straight anymore!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want to claim you are a square, you need.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

WOW! just wow, do you hear yourself?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

Believe it or not, straight to jail.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Polar coordinate straight

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Define straight in a precise, mathematical way.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The tangent of all points along the line equal that line

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Only true in Cartesian coordinates.

A straight line in polar coordinates with the same tangent would be a circle.

EDIT: it is still a “straight” line. But then the result of a square on a surface is not the same shape any more.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A straight line in polar coordinates with the same tangent would be a circle.

I'm not sure that's true. In non-euclidean geometry it might be, but aren't polar coordinates just an alternative way of expressing cartesian?

Looking at a libre textbook, it seems to be showing that a tangent line in polar coordinates is still a straight line, not a circle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I’m saying that the tangent of a straight line in Cartesian coordinates, projected into polar, does not have constant tangent. A line with a constant tangent in polar, would look like a circle in Cartesian.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Polar Functions and dydx

We are interested in the lines tangent a given graph, regardless of whether that graph is produced by rectangular, parametric, or polar equations. In each of these contexts, the slope of the tangent line is dydx. Given r=f(θ), we are generally not concerned with r′=f′(θ); that describes how fast r changes with respect to θ. Instead, we will use x=f(θ)cosθ, y=f(θ)sinθ to compute dydx.

From the link above. I really don't understand why you seem to think a tangent line in polar coordinates would be a circle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I knew math was homophobic!