Give it 1 year and people will be complaining 1.7 GB/s is not enough
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)
Hardware
130 readers
24 users here now
A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
Still good, Once upon a time HDDs were 10,000x slower than RAM, now top end SSDs are less than 100x slower than RAM, we might eventually reach a point where you can read and write directly from your hard-drive with no need for RAM at all.
Well Intel's Octane was meant to be that. I'm not sure it quite made it but anyway it ended up being way too expensive and people just stuck with RAM + disk.