this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
70 points (94.9% liked)

Games

31990 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Guy just seems like kind of a dick after reading the article.

[–] Pyro 49 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Do I not seem approachable?"

He says, after bragging about threatening a kid with federal crime for datamining a released game.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Most of these I'm perfectly fine with, leakers get banned, but what was that pokemon kid? The kid pulled a texture out of a public release and this guy goes threatening the parents for "federal crimes." What the shit?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This guy is the kind of scumbag that gives lawyers bad names and.. that is a REALLY REALLY high bar. His "do I not seem approachable" stance on investigating sexual harassment says it all. His focus is solely on damage control, nothing else.

That said: The way he tells it (and considering this was high profile, he read his notes before or even during the interview): He very specifically did not threaten the parents. They asked if it was hacking. He never said it was hacking but he DID say that hacking is a federal crime.

And this is why, much like cops, never talk to a lawyer without a lawyer present.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

never said it was hacking but he DID say that hacking is a federal crime.

He didn't threaten them directly. The parent asked and he could have just said no. But instead he starts talking about "federal crimes." If that's irrelevant, why even bring that up? That sounds like intentional misleading to me.

"do I not seem approachable" stance on investigating sexual harassment

The guy sounds real pleasant, but that was about leaking and not harassment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

What's the definition of "hacking"? Because datamining could be as simple as using a hex editor or extracting compressed assets. Do those qualify as "hacking"? (Not even necessarily asking you, more just trying to make a point that this is an extremely broad term).

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

Wow, this guy has serious punchable face energy. It's not even that interesting, the leakers he catches (or at least the only ones he talks about) are really dumb (one is a child who data mined!).