Opensource

1450 readers

20 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

pylapp

On Open Source and the Sustainability of the Commons (ploum.net)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/opensource

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Much have been said about the need to pay Open Source developers for their work and the fact that huge corporations use open source software without contributing back.

Most articles I’ve been reading on the subject completely miss the mark. Plenty of commentators try to reinvent some kind of "free software but with forced contributions" or "free software but non-commercial". Those are naive and wrong. If you impose limitations, it’s, by definition, not free software anymore.

The problem is not about Open Source or Free Software. The problem is everything else.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ericjmorey 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The way to get money from libre software is to sell support services.

[–] anzo 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That, and sponsoring, are the current and main avenues. Yet, it's been shown they're not enough. Hence, the discussion...

[–] ericjmorey 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think that many developers are poor at or unwilling to work on marketing efforts or creating independent business relationships, so getting hired by a company like RedHat, Microsoft, etc. to work on a project is the way they sell their services.

[–] refalo 2 points 4 months ago

If you impose limitations, it’s, by definition, not free software anymore.

All licenses impose limitations of some kind. Especially the GPL.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Excellent article.