this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
517 points (89.7% liked)

memes

9806 readers
5 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 143 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

This ignores the "without representation" part. England gutted colonies' ability to govern

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It also ignores that taxes were actually LOWERED on tea just before the Boston Tea Party. This made it so taxed tea was cheaper than smuggled tea and people would be paying that tax without getting representation. Thus, the whole reason for fighting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The whole reason for fighting is that the American colonies were rich. Initially they had been propped up by the British. But, once the French were essentially wiped out, the colonists no longer had need of the British military, and they were now richer than the British, so they no longer wanted to contribute to the motherland and wanted to be independent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (20 children)

The colonial governments had previously had influence over laws in that their elected officials would advise the governors. England shut that down. Patrick Henry made the "taxation without representation" argument ten years before the Declaration of Independence

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Your jobs were to harvest resources and kill Indians not play pretend parliament

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Boston was trying to hide and store wealth before the revolution and it’s still doing it to this day.

It is so common that when Massachusetts passed its billionaire tax recently, the real estate market got worried they might lose revenue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Taxation without representation is they key. They forcefully tried to shutdown the local governments and establish a dictator.

The irony is that the US has done this to south America

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago

Imperialism and slavery make the capital go round

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago

Taxation without representation was the excuse. As always, the reason was "wait, we're the ones with more resources!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Irony? It's was always the plan...

[–] [email protected] 96 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I wonder why the colonies were in that war to begin with. Was it because GB dragged them in kicking and screaming, and the people living there had no say in the matter?

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's kinda what a colony is when you think about it. A colony that can refuse the colonial overlords is.... well.... not a colony 🤣.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The whole concept is revolting.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Colonies do lead to revolutions in most cases, yes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

All this talk is making my head spin

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

I see what you did there

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If you've ever wondered why many US cities have French names (Baton Rouge, Des Moines, Boise, Terre Haute, St. Louis, Louisville, Dubuque, Detroit, Marquette, New (Nouvelle) Orleans), it's because those were all under French control when they were named.

The colonists couldn't expand westward without hitting French territory, so yes they wanted war against the French.

The British settlers along the coast were upset that French troops would now be close to the western borders of their colonies. They felt the French would encourage their tribal allies among the North American natives to attack them. Also, the British settlers wanted access to the fertile land of the Ohio River Valley for the new settlers that were flooding into the British colonies seeking farm land

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years%27_War

Do you know what actually started the 7 years war? It was when George Washington (a Lt. Colonel in the British army) ambushed a French force who were building a fort (Fort Duquesne) to defend their territory near the Ohio river. The French then attacked Washington's army and forced it to surrender. The first battlefront in the 7 years war was in North America, and it was a territorial dispute over the Ohio river valley.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 3 months ago (5 children)

to protect you from the French

lol. oh man, that's hilarious. Stay in school, kids.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I believe they meant to protect North American territories from French capture, not necessarily to prevent individual bodily harm, but that doesn't fit as nicely in meme format.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

So… they saved the land, not the people. It’s like cutting employee salaries to avoid a takeover from another company. Don’t worry everyone… we “saved” you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The territories were the things the US founding fathers cared about. They were almost all rich -- or at least formerly rich like Samuel Adams.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Maddier1993 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Europe's problems are the world's problems but the world's problems are never Europe's problems.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Yeah, they really wanted to rule them all

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Imagine my surprise when I learned that Europe was adjacent to Japan.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Europe" is just an Asian peninsula with delusions of grandeur.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

It is interesting to see that Sweden is only three land borders away from North Korea.

Sweden - Finland

Finland - Russia

Russia - DPRK

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

And Brazil!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Don't forget the section of South America that is also Europe on that picture.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

Thank you. Gonna save this picture for when someone calls the migrant crisis an invasion of Europe.

Projection like always.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol, love how French Guyana is "Europe"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

The US took over that role after WW2

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

Bailing out the East India Company has entered the chat

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I had heard that they were actually lowering taxes and tariffs on imported goods and since the founding fathers were all involved in smuggling goods in — the lower taxes threatened their personal income so they rebelled

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's complicated. They removed all taxation that would have benefitted the the colonies, but kept the Townshend Act taxes in place.

The colonies had been evading the Townshend taxes, largely because they were understood to be punitive. That's the primary reason tea had been smuggled from The Netherlands, as resistance to what was viewed as unjust taxation.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Y'all started your own shit in Europe. Don't tax us for your fuckups.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

The first battles of the 7 years war were in the Ohio river valley. They resulted in a certain Lt. Colonel of the British Army named George Washington surrendering.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

and the 7 years war was fought without consent from the colonies. The colonies did not want to fight the french, their allies.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

The colonies, including a colonist named George Washington (a Lieutenant Colonel in the British Army) started the 7 year war by ambushing a group of French soldiers building a fort on French territory in the Ohio river valley. I don't know where you get the idea that the British colonists were allies with the French. But, if that was the case, the French must have found that a pretty confusing thing for their allies to do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For perspective, there are two ways we pay taxes currently: direct taxation via tax collection and indirect taxation via the inflation of the currency supply (govt prints money and uses it, your money becomes worth less about 2-3% year in good years). That second tax is optional, there are ways to not use your national currency and therefore not pay the inflationary tax. That second tax is also insidious because people don't realize it's happening. If you have to raise actual taxes, suddenly you get revolts and removed from power. Which is why most wars are funded with inflationary spending, not tax increases. People will gladly pay extra tax for popular wars, but not unpopular ones.

Imagine how the world might look different if inflationary spending wasn't a particularly powerful taxation tool because not much value was wrapped up in national currencies. Imagine if going to war meant raising actual taxes. Might we have a world where there is less war because war is now harder to fund?

load more comments
view more: next ›