this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
494 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
2925 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So I did a quick number crunch on this: To get to about 75kg of protein per day, let's say you only eat lean turkey and drink protein shakes, you'd need 200kg of turkey and 200L of protein shake.

You could probably make this intake more efficient, but however it goes in, I don't think my body would like me eating 370,000 calories per day.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

But eating 370,000 calories per day WOULD change your body drastically.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong! I could probably eat 365,000 less calories and still drastically change my body.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

5 kcal per day would change your body drastically? Oof.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the above poster meant 370,000 kcal so it's a 5 Mcal difference

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I was joking by taking him literally.. I would say this does not come across well in text but IRL this kind of joke also fails to land regularly

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was joking by taking you literally

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Are you defining literally as literal or as figurative? I literally do not know anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Hey, I don't do macros, it's all about nanonutrition these days.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what he actually meant. 1g/kg maybe? That would be 125% of the RDA, which I don't know if it's a good idea but it's certainly more reasonable than…that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

A common, reasonably evidence based, protein target for bodybuilding is 1-2 g/kg, with the cursed unit of 1g/lb being about the upper limit of what's useful. That's probably what this post is referencing.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Eating 76 kilograms of protein seems slightly excessive, would change my body drastically no doubt. /s

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was going to say the same thing. I can't imagine the shits that would give you.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably wouldn't get to that point, it would be like in Seven where Gluttony's insides burst.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

That certainly is a DRASTIC change

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They might be referencing the rough math for daily protein consumption. It works out to about 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight for men and half a gram per pound for women.

Or they could be a bat

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

why did you mix grams and pounds

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

This is a pretty common calculation for people who track protien intake in the US, since most people weigh themselves in pounds, and most nutritional information is provided in grams.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

On US nutritional labels fats, carbs, and proteins are listed in grams, but we generally measure everything in pounds.

When calculating your macro nutrition for weight gain the general recommendation comes out to about 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight. This is just a coincidence, but makes finding out how much protein you need to gain muscle mass pretty easy if you know how much you weigh and given that all of our labels have that info in grams.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

For the same reason they still use pounds for anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Because my gram always makes me gain the pounds with the food she cooks :)

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A gram per pound is overshooting it quite a bit unless you're a vegan not minding your protein quality intake. The maximum effective protein intake is ~1.6g/kg (0.72g/lbs), more than that will just go to "waste" (energy/energy storage). If you're steroids the limit is higher, but there's currently no exact number on it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

"Energy storage" generally meaning "fat," for the Americans in the audience.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Yes, if you eat your body weight every day, you will be dead. That's a drastic change to your body.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Eat a single handful of Oleander leaves with a cupful of any drink you wish.

Your body will change DRASTICALLY.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think he meant to say 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight. I see this referenced a bit. Still funny to imagine eating that much though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Cattle mutilations attributed to UFOs are actually just this guy trying to get his protein

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's the amount you need so protein intake doesn't limit your muscle growthwhen you're taking steroids

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

100 push-ups

100 sit-ups

100 squats

10km run

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As long as you are ok being bald

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I already have the bald part so the rest seems like a general improvement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

And no air conditioning! Even in the summer!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, kidney damage, cancer and liver damage with high triglycerides.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Changed right to being dead, how transformative

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

OP's mom looking as wet as ever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Why is this not ratio'd moment..