And if he doesn't, thats a "loss" for some reason. Nothing is actually lost mind you, there is no 7.5 trillion pounds of baby meat in a dump somewhere.
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
774 points (97.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
5467 readers
7 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Nevertheless, we've fired the CEO and given him 6 billion pounds of baby meat for failing.
And he gets another sweet gig with another big company because he's got "experience"
It was a loss because the CEO had already received an MBO in percentage of planned growth
Reminds me of the Reddit CEO who was sobbing that Reddit is not profitable (and that's why they had to block 3rd party apps) while receiving a $200 million salary.
My calculations show that around the age of 80 he will be massive enough to turn earth into a black hole if evenly distributed onto its volume
Edit: actually by the age of 30, because I misread the current age to be 12 months
And how will this affect the stock price?
Positively, probably, as the stock will get to the moon literally and long before that moment
Oh shit, the economy!
If that's with it evenly distributed, then with all that weight as a virtual point source due to the difference in size between the baby and Earth, wouldn't the baby collapse to its roche limit even faster? And as long as it's not a kuggleblitz (that's def not spelled right) black hole it would quickly consume the Earth and grow even larger, right?
Yes, but then we would better use human body density to determine the size of an object, it's not going to be realistically (lol) a point source anyway and will take longer to become a black hole, I think 🤔
They also expects if a woman can give birth to a baby in nine months, nine women only need one month to "produce" a baby. Or even just eight or seven women, because of synergy effects.
These people think the only kind of growth is exponential.
Because they don't know anything that grows faster than exponential, and anything that grows slower doesn't look as good in the reports
Slower growth is worse than faster growth. I want 10 million next week not next year.
This kind of capitalism is a disease.
6 lbs., 13 oz. at birth for anyone wondering.
7.5 trillion = 7.5x10^12
40 three-month intervals in 10 years
P = Pounds at birth
P x 2^40 = 7.5x10^40
P = 7.5x10^40 / 2^40
P ≈ 6.82 lbs.
P ≈ 6 lbs., 13 oz.
Now, if that isn't some sound empirical reasoning, I don't know what is!