The most important step is to get rid of limited liability and corporate personhood. Until executives and shareholders can be held responsible for corporate actions, there's no incentive for those executives and shareholders to make the corporation act on any ethic but profit or aggrandizement.
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
11 points (72.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26654 readers
1118 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What do you think of corporations being able to persist almost indefinitely? As a part to introducing greater accountability, might dissolution be appropriate at times?
I don't have a problem with businesses as a form of intergenerational wealth, actually. I could be persuaded to, I suppose; but as long as the people running it are able to be held accountable I don't see the longevity as a negative.
Workers above Owners.
Workers act unethically all the time. We are just as deserving of regulation as any other economic entity.
Source: waitress who has quit some disgusting restaurants
Oh absolutely, my main point is that the people doing the work are more important than the people who don't.
The implication being that removing the "no control, all the work, vs "total control, none of the work" paradigm it would reduce the amount of unethical behaviour that is coerced from workers. It won't get to 0, and I agree that there still needs to be extensive regulation, but it would be an improvement.