Not The Onion

11929 readers

2 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

517

JK Rowling slammed for asking if she can be Black if she likes “Motown & fancy myself in cornrows” (www.lgbtqnation.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

318 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

House elves in Harry Potter books.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I am not defending her but that is in no way proof of the claim being made. It's a fictional book.

Now, if she's on record saying that, and using them as justification, then that's different

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In a since-deleted post on her site Pottermore, the writer argued that while freeing the slaves was noble in isolation, being enslaved is what's better for the elves right now and they should stay that way until they politely ask to not be enslaved.

https://archive.md/2020.05.08-221547/https://www.wizardingworld.com/features/to-spew-or-not-to-spew-hermione-granger-and-the-pitfalls-of-activism

I don't know who the original writer is and I don't know of an archived copy before Pottermore ended and everything was transferred to Wizarding World, but I believe it's from an era of Pottermore where she wrote the blog entries herself

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Seems like the delight dobby portrayed when he was freed would put that argument to rest.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nah the actual in universe explanation is that Dobby is weird for wanting to be freed. Literal direct quote from Goblet of Fire

“But Harry set Dobby free, and he was over the moon about it!” said Hermione. “And we heard he’s asking for wages now!”

“Yeah, well, yeh get weirdos in every breed. I’m not sayin’ there isn’t the odd elf who’d take freedom, but yeh’ll never persuade most of ’em ter do it — no, nothin’ doin’, Hermione.”

Hermione looked very cross indeed and stuffed her box of badges back into her cloak pocket.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Still no, it's still a fictional story, just because you write a slave character doesn't mean you're pro slavery, just because you write a misogynist doesn't make you a misogynist, etc.

Again, she still might be, but citing Dobby as your evidence is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

She choose to write what she wrote, she can be judged for it. You are defending her and should stop

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Asking genuinely, why that would be a political statement? An author is not bound to represent his or her own opinion in books, I think, no?