this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
739 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Even if you have encrypted your traffic with a VPN (or the Tor Network), advanced traffic analysis is a growing threat against your privacy. Therefore, we now introduce DAITA.

Through constant packet sizes, random background traffic and data pattern distortion we are taking the first step in our battle against sophisticated traffic analysis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago (27 children)

Should you though?

I get it, it's annoying, but the entire "let's block people with opinions I don't like" is probably the single source of pillerization and increased extremism on the internet.

If I'm not allowed to have a discussion or disagreement with you, and get kicked out instead, I'll just go to places where they will talk with me and where it's chock full of other idiots like me who are much more extreme and in our safety bubble we can all continue not beat the same dead horse and circle jerk and make eachother more extreme because there are no dissenting voices, there are no voices or reason and calm, there are no cooler heads around.

This entire moderation where we simply started dumping people with who we disagree has made the world a.much, much worse place.

Granted, it sucks to have to deal with crazies and extremists, but at least whilst they're in the group we can all keep them grounded in reality.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If I’m not allowed to have a discussion or disagreement with you, and get kicked out instead, I’ll just go to places where they will talk with me

I actually tried to, and if it was possible to have rational and polite discussion, without straw man arguments, dog pilling, personal attacks and finally threats of violence, I would have continued to try. But sadly all of this happen, multiple times.

At some points I considered leaving Lemmy, thinking that this federation as a whole was not safe for debating. But then I started understanding patterns, either it was from the users from a specific instance, or it was communities from a specific instance that turned like that. Overall the pattern seem to be that if the instance mentions extreme political ideologies in its description or if the profiles of its admins do, then debating is not possible.

If they want to stay connected to people to avoid the circle jerk, they have to work on themselves too (ex: learning to debate politely), you can't except us to absorb all the damages to help them avoid radicalization. It's like walking towards a terrorist group with flowers while they are shooting around and expecting them to be inspired by your pacifism.

I do enjoy debating and questioning my own beliefs, but I am not on Lemmy to consume my mental health, so I need to take some actions to protect it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

not safe debating

Sorry, just to comment on this one: I really dislike that phrase, its use is part of the reason why we are where we are. You ARE safe, all the time. It's not like you talking in a lemmy instance puts you at risk of being shot in the head.

You may encounter assholes, and opinions that you don't like but that doesn't make you unsafe. Uncomfortable, mayby, for having to read information you oppose?

A black man driving and stopped by US police can claim he feels not safe. We lemmies are perfectly fine. I think many people need to grow a little thicker skin in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Uncomfortable, mayby, for having to read information you oppose?

dog pilling, personal attacks and finally threats of violence [...] I am not on Lemmy to consume my mental health

Not all violence is physical.

I think many people need to grow a little thicker skin in that regard.

Are you blaming me for not having a tick enough skin instead of blaming the behavior of attackers? Please reconsider that thought.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

not all violence is physical

Yeaaahhh, no. Though there is verbal abuse out there, whenever people start talking about verbal violence they're basically tslkit about any opinion they don't like.

Blaming you for not having a thick enough skin instead of blaming the behaviour of the attacker

I would not blame you if someone hits you without provocation, but in my admittedly personal experience, people tend to talk shit, then get told off and claim violence, or they may hear an opinion they don't like and start talking about attackers, somehow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Inciting violence In a group context very much is verbal and leads to violence.

Threats of violence are a type of violence because a sensible person has to react and prepare for the violence.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm not on the internet or lemmy to make the world a better place, I'm on here to kill time/enjoy myself/learn some things. I dont have the mental space to deal extremists, and particularly extremists that have a world view thats incompatible with itself if taken at face value, and I certainly dont have anything valid that I can learn from tankies, and as such, my block list has gotten quite large, and my general mood has increased because of it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is my thinking for using .world. I don’t get all my news or interaction from Lemmy or the internet as a whole, and Lemmy is small enough that it has an almost zero impact on broader society. I respect those who try, but if my internet experience was antagonistic or frustrating I’d probably just stop using it.

I also feel that conversations of that nature are best had in person, where there’s a higher chance of changing minds. I’ve no proof but it feels like internet discussions are taken less seriously and thus merely end before any opinion changing can occur.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

You also have far less info on internet conversion on whether or not its being had in good faith, which is an extra hurdle on opinion change

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Maybe, but your list is, in part, so large because we keep pushing people out to let them become extremists

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I “blocked” hexbear, because a mod didn’t take the time to use their brain, labeled me a “pedophile apologist” and banned me from the entire instance. If they moderate based on “I don’t care what actually happened, I’m mad” then I’m not going to bother interacting with them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Hexbear mods are paid to spread propaganda, not use their brain, two fairly exclusive activities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And that's the problem from both sides. You both need to continue talking. I got banned from Reddit subs too for literally asking questions or wrong think.

People need to grow skin

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I literally can’t. Even when an interaction would have happened outside of hexbear, their users can’t see my messages.

My blocking them was just to prevent me from seeing content I couldn’t interact with.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Being blocked and censured under false pretenses is not a "both sides problem" lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was planning to, but ultimately didn't. I have handed out personal blocks to obvious trolls and a brunch of hexbear users that spammed gifs in every single thread though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Nope. I have filtered both grad and hexbear out of my feed though, I don't need their shit there. And don't forget that many instances already are defederated with them, so there's also fewer of them through that!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This operates under the assumption that there are good decent people on every instance, but instances like Hexbear and Lemmy.ml are inherently corrupt and run by people who want to sow misinformation and chaos to negatively impact western powers. I'm not saying the whole thing is a Chinese operation, but if it were then it would be run exactly the same way it is now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All the more reason to walk around on hexbear and talk to people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I'm sure they will absolutely love that, let my go pick some out for you:

HERE

HERE

HERE

all fresh new "people" convos for you that are definitely not state sponsored or anti-nato in any way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I don't block instances, just individuals that have proven to not act in good faith. I try to expose myself to as many diverse opinions as possible, but know if the people holding those opinions can back it up with facts, or are at least willing to consider the possibility that they're wrong, and I try my best to do the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Problem I see with this is that a lot of "I block people who act in bad faith" have hair triggers when it comes to what they consider bad faith. I see their comments all over the place where its a disagreement and 6 comments in they're claiming the other person is acting in bad faith and they're blocking them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, that certainly happens.

I personally have only blocked like 2 users. It takes a lot for me to do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I very well get what you're saying but a lot of people don't understand the difference between "has a valid opinion I disagree with" and "is a flame troll LLM" and just block anyone with an opinion they don't like, loudly proclaiming"you are a bad fatig actor!"

I think it really made the entire world a worse place to be in, everyone is in their own echo chambers now, nice and safely shielded from scary opinions that don't align with their warped world view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yup, and I don't know the solution here, but I'm honestly giving it a solid try. I intentionally place myself in online groups where people disagree with me to hopefully learn something from them and challenge their own preconceptions. I'm working on a ranking algorithm that should help highlight insightful content based on a web of trust (trick is to trust people who vote based on constructiveness, not agreement).

People point to media companies and politicians for the reason we're so divided these days, but really that finger should be pointed back at us, the people. Those politicians wouldn't be in power and media companies wouldn't optimize for divergent opinions if we vote them in and reward them.

I don't know the solution here, but I try to do my part. I live in a very conservative area, have libertarian views, and spend my time on leftist social media. I just hope it all balances out in the end.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Being able to block what you want is great, having other people decide what to block for you is not.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

I would argue it's not. It caused people to become more and more extreme, locked in their own echo rooms where they just become more distant from a common center....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"let's block people with opinions I don't like"

I don't think a lot of them are actually people, but rather LLMs. Also, does it count as "people with opinions" when it's shills paid to spread authoritarian propaganda?

I do agree we should limit personal blocking, but that's because we need to collectively manage the Fediverse. There's no budget for countering misinformation campaigns, just us.

Instances blocking propaganda instances, on the other hand, is fantastic. It's what we need for the Fediverse to survive instead of going the way of Voat and other extremist communities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

While LLMs have become a problem recently, this problem existed since way before that

load more comments (18 replies)